How can I troubleshoot problems with fsolve in MATLAB?

  • Context: MATLAB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter La82
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matlab
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on troubleshooting issues with the fsolve function in MATLAB. The user encountered an "unknown function" error due to incorrect syntax when calling fsolve. The correct usage involves defining the function handle and ensuring all constants are initialized within the function. After resolving the initial error, the user faced a new issue where fsolve reported "No solution found," indicating potential problems with the equations or their formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MATLAB syntax and function handles
  • Familiarity with the fsolve function and its parameters
  • Basic knowledge of numerical methods for solving equations
  • Ability to debug mathematical equations and functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the MATLAB fsolve documentation for detailed syntax and examples
  • Learn how to implement function tolerance settings in fsolve
  • Explore techniques for debugging MATLAB functions to identify errors
  • Study methods for simplifying complex equations to improve solvability
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for MATLAB users, particularly those working with numerical methods, engineers solving complex equations, and students learning about function optimization.

La82
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am a MATLAB newbie and am having some problems getting fsolve to work. I tried using the example given in the help section but it keeps saying that my function (lambda_y1) since that is the first one it finds is unknown.

My functions are generated like this (sorry for the messy notation):

function F = myfun(lambda_y1,lambda_y2,h_1,h_2,F_c1,F_c2)

F = [g_1+607200.*lambda_1.^3-1899000.*lambda_1.^2+1976400.*lambda_1-684600;

g_2+607200.*lambda_2.^3-1899000.*lambda_2.^2+1976400.*lambda_2-684600;

lambda_y1.^2.*(4.*h_m1.^2+y_01.^2)-(4.*(h_m1-h_1).^2+(lambda_1.*y_01).^2);

lambda_y2.^2.*(4.*h_m2.^2+y_02.^2)-(4.*(h_m2+h_2).^2+(lambda_2.*y_02).^2);

F_c1.^2.*(4.*(h_m1-h_1).^2+(lambda_1.*y_01).^2)-16.*g_1^2.*(h_m1 - h_1).^2;

F_c2.^2.*(4.*(h_m2+h_2).^2+(lambda_2.*y_02).^2)-16.*g_2^2.*(h_m2 + h_2).^2];

I call it like this:
x0=[0.5,0.5,0.0005,0.0005,0.1,0.1];
f = fsolve(@myfun,x0,lambda_y1,lambda_y2,h_1,h_2,F_c1,F_c2);

All the constants except for the unknowns are given earlier.

Can anyone help me get this to run?

Lonnie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the unknowns you are trying to find?
 
First of all the syntax which you are using is not correct,
most common and simple syntax is "f = fsolve(@fun,x0)", where x0 are the initial guesses.

In your case also i guess x0 are the initial guesses, the correct syntax should bex0=[0.5,0.5,0.0005,0.0005,0.1,0.1];
f = fsolve(@myfun,x0);Also, the myfun should like as follows:
it should initialize all the unknowns with their initial guesses i.e.
unknown1 = x0(1);
unknown2 = x0(2);
and so on,

also you should define all the values of the constants inside the myfun itself.
Constant1 = a;
Constant2 = b; etc.

I guess it will solve the problem.
 
Hi again,

Yep that did it, thanks a lot, but now I have run into another problem. I run my equations and get the following stopping criteria:

No solution found.

fsolve stopped because the problem appears regular as measured by the gradient,
but the vector of function values is not near zero as measured by the
default value of the function tolerance.

I get that there must be a problem with my equations, but I have no idea what to look for!

Lonnie
 
As you think, may be there is some problem with your equations, then it will be better if you check them with some known values, see if it is giving correct result.
(Also there may be the case that there is "no solution", which i think is not the case, if you are expecting some solution)
Also it will be helpful if you simplify the equations.
You will have to debug it...and see if there are any improvements.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K