How Can the Bottom Block Receive Maximum Force Without Moving the Top Block?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks, one resting on top of the other, with a focus on understanding the forces acting on them. The scenario includes a frictionless surface and involves calculating the maximum horizontal force that the bottom block can receive without causing the top block to move.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the static frictional force and the acceleration of the top block, questioning how these factors influence the maximum force on the bottom block. There are discussions about identifying the forces acting on the blocks and how to calculate the maximum acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with participants providing insights into the calculations and relationships between forces and accelerations. Some participants have confirmed their understanding of the problem and calculations, while others express frustration over the difficulty of the question.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the frictionless nature of the surfaces involved, which is a critical aspect of the problem. Additionally, the maximum static frictional force is noted as a key factor in determining the dynamics of the blocks.

Tubs
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
If a 4kg block is resting on a 5kg block and the maximum horizontal force exerted on the block without it moving is 12N, what is the maximum horizontal force that the bottom block can receive without the top block moving? The surface between the bottom block and the ground is frictionless.

I can't seem to solve this :frown: any help would be awesome :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tubs said:
If a 4kg block is resting on a 5kg block and the maximum horizontal force exerted on the block without it moving is 12N, what is the maximum horizontal force that the bottom block can receive without the top block moving?

The question obviously must mean "what is the maximum force on the bottom block such that the top block will not slide."

From the first part, you have the maximum static frictional force between the two blocks, 12 N.

This static frictional force is the force that must accelerate the top block. With this force, and the given mass, what is the maximum acceleration of the top block?

Once you find that, ask yourself: "Self? if the top block accelerates at this quantity, what total pushing force would be required to get the whole mass accelerating at that quantity?"
 
Just to clarify, is the 12N MAX force applied to the 4kg block?? If it is, think of what force will accelerate the 4kg block forward, while it is positioned on top of the 5kg block. This force has a max value (12N). Associated with this max force is a max acceleration for the 4kg block. If you can determine the max acceleration of the 4kg block, you know the max acceleration of the 4kg/5kg system. See what you can come up with... (1) identify the force that causes the 4kg block's acceleration, and (2) understand how that force, via acceleration, can be used to determine the max possible horizontal force applied to the 5kg block. I will stand by for your response(s).
 
Fnet1 = ma
12 = (4)a
a = 3 m/s^2

Fmax = ma
= 9(3)
= 27N

All good?
 
Looks good. Another example, where all the surfaces are frictionless, would be a 4kg block tethered to the top of the 5kg block via a horizontal string. Assuming the max tension the string could withstand is 12N, the string would be able to accelerate the 4kg block to a max amount of 3m/s/s. And similarly, the max horizontal force applied to the 5kg block would be again 27N.
 
all good :smile:
 
Fermat said:
all good :smile:

The comment on that question was that it was difficult. Compared to these other ones it is simple, I should have seen that answer right away. STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID :mad:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K