MHB How can we show that a continuous function satisfies a specific inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2017
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that for a continuous function f defined on [a,∞) and satisfying the inequality f(x) ≤ A + B∫a^x f(t) dt (with B < 0), the integral ∫a^∞ f(x) dx exists and is bounded by -A/B. The approach involves defining F(x) as the integral of f from a to x, noting that F(x) approaches L = ∫a^∞ f(t) dt as x approaches infinity. By applying the Mean Value Theorem, it is shown that f(x_n) approaches 0 for a sequence x_n tending to infinity. Ultimately, this leads to the conclusion that L must satisfy L ≤ -A/B, confirming the original inequality. The discussion highlights the clever use of subsequences to navigate potential issues with f(x) not approaching zero.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Let $f : [a,\infty)\to \Bbb R$ be a continuous function that satisfies the inequality $\displaystyle f(x) \le A + B\int_a^x f(t)\, dt$, where $A$ and $B$ are constants with $B < 0$. If $\displaystyle \int_a^\infty f(x)\, dx$ exists, show that $\displaystyle \int_a^\infty f(x)\, dx \le -A/B$.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations to Opalg for his correct solution.

[sp]Let $$F(x) = \int_a^x\!\!\! f(t)\,dt$$ and let $$L = \int_a^\infty\!\!\! f(t)\,dt$$. Then $F(x) \to L$ as $x\to\infty.$

Since $F$ is differentiable, with derivative $f$, it follows from the mean value theorem that (for each integer $n \geqslant a$) $F(n+1) - F(n) = f(x_n)$ for some $x_n \in (n,n+1).$ But $F(n+1) - F(n) \to L-L = 0$ as $n\to\infty$. Therefore $f(x_n) \to0.$

Now let $n\to\infty$ in the inequality $$f(x_n) \leqslant A + B\int_a^{x_n}\!\!\!f(t)\,dt$$ to get $0\leqslant A + BL$. This inequality gets flipped when we divide though by the negative number $B$, giving $0 \geqslant \frac AB + L$, or $L\leqslant -\frac AB.$

Ackbach Comment: Opalg avoids the problem of $f(x)\not\to 0$ as $x\to\infty$ by choosing a subsequence $\{x_n\}\to \infty$ and $\{f(x_n)\}\to 0$ based on the Mean Value Theorem. Very clever!
[/sp]
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K