How Do 1-Dimensional Strings Transform into Point Particles in Physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WaveJumper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transformation of 1-dimensional strings into zero-dimensional point particles within the context of string theory. Participants explore the implications of dimensionality, the nature of energy, and the conceptualization of strings in theoretical physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how a 1-dimensional string can convert into a zero-dimensional point particle, raising concerns about the physical size of energy and the dimensionality of strings.
  • Another participant argues that a string cannot exist in one dimension, suggesting that at least two dimensions are necessary, and connects this to the dimensionality proposed in string theory.
  • A third participant emphasizes the need for a clear definition of dimension, particularly regarding minimum length and size.
  • One participant proposes that a 1-dimensional string is conceptualized as a zero-dimensional point particle due to its small size and advanced mathematical frameworks, asserting that energy is a real entity rather than merely a mathematical construct.
  • This same participant also suggests that strings are not strictly one-dimensional, indicating that they vibrate in multiple dimensions beyond the conventional representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of strings and their dimensionality, with no consensus reached on the fundamental questions posed regarding the transformation of strings into point particles and the nature of energy.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions of dimensionality and the physical implications of energy as a construct versus a tangible entity. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and assumptions about string theory and dimensionality.

WaveJumper
Messages
772
Reaction score
1
My question is simple and straight forward - how does a 1-dimensional string "convert" to a zero-dimensional point particle?

And another one - for the purposes of physics, energy is not a physical object but an abstract mathematical construct. So how can a string of energy have a definite physical size(although it's the lowest tolerated by mathematical physics size - the Planck length)?

Oops, here's another one - How on Earth can a 1-dimensional string vibrate without employing a 2nd dimension? The drawings of this alleged physical object I've seen, all portray a 2-dimensional string(string is curved).

What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you can't have a string in 1 dimension can you? i mean that would just be a line, you would need at least two dimensions to have a string, but what does this have to do with string theory, don't they state that there is 10 or 11 dimensions depending on if its super symmetry. forgive me if I am wrong but that's what I thought, I am sure someone will clarify.
 
You are missing a definition of dimension. Minimum length, minimum size.
see https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=513
jal
 
Last edited by a moderator:
a one dimensional string was thought of as a zero dimensional point particle because of how small it was, and the more advanced mathematics behind the theory of strings. And energy is not a mathematical construct, its a real thing. You can have pure energy. Energy and mass are the same thing, just different forms. And just like you can have an object that we see every day of mass, you can have a string of zero mass and pure energy, like a photon or a string of energy. Also a string isn't really a one dimensional object, its just pictured that way, when really it is an object that vibrates in 10+ dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K