How Do Photons Entangle Electrons?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entanglement
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of how photons may influence the entanglement of two free electrons, particularly focusing on the conditions under which entanglement occurs and the implications of photon interactions. The scope includes theoretical considerations of quantum entanglement and the mechanisms involved in the interaction between photons and electrons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether two initially unentangled electrons can become at least partially entangled in position-momentum after a photon is emitted and absorbed between them.
  • Another participant asserts that the electrons are not guaranteed to be entangled, even partially, and expresses a desire to learn more about the topic.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that a process involving the passive separation of electrons can lead to entangled spins, but notes practical challenges in conducting experiments with entangled electrons and discusses the indistinguishability of particles in relation to entanglement.
  • One participant clarifies that if a photon is scattered off the electrons, the entanglement arises from the indistinguishability of the electrons, which can lead to entanglement if the scattering occurs within a certain proximity.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about the explanation of entanglement through indistinguishability and seeks further reading on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions necessary for entanglement to occur, particularly regarding the role of photon interactions and the concept of indistinguishability. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of entanglement and the conditions under which photons interact with electrons. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of free electrons and the mechanics of photon scattering.

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
360
Reaction score
33
Say we have a system consisting of two electrons, traveling freely, that are not initially entangled, either in spin or in position-momentum.

Then, because of their electric fields, a photon is emitted and absorbed between the two electrons.

Are the electrons now guaranteed to be at least partially entangled in position-momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
referframe said:
Say we have a system consisting of two electrons, traveling freely, that are not initially entangled, either in spin or in position-momentum.

Then, because of their electric fields, a photon is emitted and absorbed between the two electrons.

Are the electrons now guaranteed to be at least partially entangled in position-momentum?

Interesting question. They are not guaranteed to be entangled, not even partially.

that said...I know very little about it, will find out more. looking forward to some great answers from the forum.
 
If you look for a process that can produced entangled particles, a natural one is to take a pair of electrons and separate them passively in a spatial manner without using a magnetic field. Then their spins are entangled (opposite to each other in any direction of measurement). Still it is not used for experiments at long distance because it is not practical to transport electrons and they can lose their spin by interaction with photons that are usually present in the form of thermic radiation (does anyone know at which speed for given temperatures ?). Also it may be hard to produce as pairs of electrons are present in atoms but don't easily get out. Shooting away the kernel of an helium atom is possible but, well, not easy. Experiments were done with entangled photons but I personally don't know the production method.

Then, it is useless to discuss partial entanglements as quantum theory does not distinguish a blurred entanglement from a classical correlation : a entangled pair of electrons produced as above that has 1/3 probability to be preserved and 2/3 probability to be blurred (replaced by uncorrelated random spins) is the same quantum system as a classical correlated pair produced by a 1/3 probability of having been produced by a classical correlation in each of the 3 dimensions. In other words, by throwing a dice to decide if the spins are (up,down), (down,up), (right,left), (left,right), (face,back) or (back,face).
 
Last edited:
referframe said:
Say we have a system consisting of two electrons, traveling freely, that are not initially entangled, either in spin or in position-momentum.

Then, because of their electric fields, a photon is emitted and absorbed between the two electrons.

Are the electrons now guaranteed to be at least partially entangled in position-momentum?

Not sure what you mean by a photon being emitted and absorbed by electrons. Free electrons are not bound systems, and so do not have excited states that can absorb photons.

But if you mean that a photon is scattered off the electrons, then the key property which causes them to become entangled is that something is "indistinguishable". Meaning, if a photon scatters near both electrons (within the wavelength) such that it is not possible to tell which of the two electrons it scattered off of, then they become entangled.
 
Zarqon said:
But if you mean that a photon is scattered off the electrons, then the key property which causes them to become entangled is that something is "indistinguishable". Meaning, if a photon scatters near both electrons (within the wavelength) such that it is not possible to tell which of the two electrons it scattered off of, then they become entangled.

Interesting. I've never heard of this explanation of entanglement before. Where can I read about this explanation?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K