How Do Vielbeins Function in Higher-Dimensional Kaluza-Klein Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cje
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the calculation of the Ricci tensor using vielbeins in the context of Kaluza-Klein theory, specifically referencing Pope's lecture notes. The expressions for the vielbeins are defined as hat{e}^{a}=e^{\alpha\phi}{e}^{a} and hat{e}^{z}=e^{\beta\phi}(dz+A_{\mu}dx^{\mu}). The relationship hat{E}_A^M hat{e}_M^B=\delta_A^B is crucial for deriving the inverse vielbeins. The discussion also seeks resources for further reading on higher-dimensional vielbeins.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kaluza-Klein theory
  • Familiarity with vielbeins and their role in general relativity
  • Knowledge of Ricci tensor calculations
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Ricci tensor in Kaluza-Klein theory
  • Explore advanced texts on vielbeins in higher-dimensional spacetimes
  • Learn about the spin connection and its applications in differential geometry
  • Investigate the implications of vielbeins in string theory and M-theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers interested in advanced topics in general relativity and higher-dimensional theories.

cje
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I try to check the calculation that Kaluza and Klein originally did. It is in the first pages of Pope's lecture notes: http://faculty.physics.tamu.edu/pope/ihplec.pdf
I have a few problems with the calculation of the Ricci tensor with spin connection, namely with the inverse vielbeins. The vielbeins are given by the following expressions
\begin{align}
\hat{e}^{a}=e^{\alpha\phi}{e}^{a}
\end{align}
\begin{align}
\hat{e}^{z}=e^{\beta\phi}(dz+A_{\mu}dx^{\mu})
\end{align}
\begin{align}
\hat{E}_A^M\hat{e}_M^B=\delta_A^B
\end{align}
where A,B are the flat indexes in 5d and M,N the curved ones. How can I calculate for example
$ \hat{E}_z^{\mu}$ from this relation? is it correct to use this relation like in the following expressions?
\begin{align}
\delta_a^z =\hat{e}_a^M\hat{E}_M^z=\hat{e}_a^{\mu}\hat{E}_{\mu}^z+\hat{e}_a^{z}\hat{E}_{z}^{z}
\end{align}
Are there any books where I can find more about vielbeins in more than 4d?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cje said:
I try to check the calculation that Kaluza and Klein originally did. It is in the first pages of Pope's lecture notes: http://faculty.physics.tamu.edu/pope/ihplec.pdf
I have a few problems with the calculation of the Ricci tensor with spin connection, namely with the inverse vielbeins. The vielbeins are given by the following expressions
\begin{align}<br /> \hat{e}^{a}=e^{\alpha\phi}{e}^{a}<br /> \end{align}<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \hat{e}^{z}=e^{\beta\phi}(dz+A_{\mu}dx^{\mu})<br /> \end{align}<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \hat{E}_A^M\hat{e}_M^B=\delta_A^B<br /> \end{align}<br /> where A,B are the flat indexes in 5d and M,N the curved ones. How can I calculate for example <br /> $ \hat{E}_z^{\mu}$ from this relation? is it correct to use this relation like in the following expressions?<br /> \begin{align} <br /> \delta_a^z =\hat{e}_a^M\hat{E}_M^z=\hat{e}_a^{\mu}\hat{E}_{\mu}^z+\hat{e}_a^{z}\hat{E}_{z}^{z}<br /> \end{align}

Are there any books where I can find more about vielbeins in more than 4d?

Just fixed the latex for you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K