How do we get from one step to another in these factorial equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter homeworkhelpls
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding factorial equations, particularly in the context of binomial coefficients and their relationships. Participants are exploring how to manipulate and interpret expressions involving factorials, specifically relating to the equation \(\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n}{k+1}\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the steps involved in transitioning between different factorial expressions. Questions arise regarding the manipulation of terms, the role of \(k!\), and the interpretation of binomial notation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants expressing confusion about specific steps in the factorial manipulation process. Some have offered hints and clarifications, while others are seeking a more foundational understanding of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be a lack of clarity regarding the notation used for binomial coefficients and the foundational principles of factorials. Participants are encouraged to revisit basic definitions and relationships to aid their understanding.

homeworkhelpls
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
confused about this
Relevant Equations
none
1667770857166.png

this is the answer, but i don't get why k factorial multiplies the bracket, what i did was k factorial divided by the bracket
 
Physics news on Phys.org
homeworkhelpls said:
this is the answer
What's the question ?

##\ ##
 
find n in terms of k
 
BvU said:
What's the question ?

##\ ##
1667771752852.png
 
homeworkhelpls said:
It's still not clear as to just what is puzzling you about this problem - or it's solution.

Do you not understand where the following comes from?
##\displaystyle (n-k-1)! (k+1)!=(n-k)!k! ##

or - Do you not understand either of the following?
##\displaystyle (k+1)!=k! \, (k+1)##

##\displaystyle (n-k)!= (n-k-1)!\,(n-k)##

or - Is it something else ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
i don't understand how we go from here to here only.
1667853016007.png
 
homeworkhelpls said:
i don't understand how we go from here to here only.
View attachment 316855
Can you try to prove, for example, that$$(n-k)!k! = [(n-k-1)!k!](n-k)$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #10
PeroK said:
Can you try to prove, for example, that$$(n-k)!k! = [(n-k-1)!k!](n-k)$$
no i cant prove it as i don't understand how to get to this step
 
  • #11
homeworkhelpls said:
no i cant prove it as i don't understand how to get to this step
What if you take out the common factor of ##k!##? Can you see that:
$$(n-k)! = (n-k-1)!(n-k)$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #12
i see the k! in (n-k)! but wheres it on the right hand side?
 
  • #13
homeworkhelpls said:
i see the k! in (n-k)! but wheres it on the right hand side?
Please quote the post you are referring to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #14
homeworkhelpls said:
i see the k! in (n-k)! but wheres it on the right hand side?
That's not ##k!## in ##(n-k)!##.

Suppose we let ##m=n-k##.

Can you see that ##m!=(m-1)! \, m## ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #15
SammyS said:
That's not ##k!## in ##(n-k)!##.

Suppose we let ##m=n-k##.

Can you see that ##m!=(m-1)! \, m## ?
ohhhhhh yes because m(m-1)(m-2)(m-3)! ... is part of the expression so wouldn't (n-k)! just be n! ? (-k+n)! how does that get k! ?
 
  • #16
homeworkhelpls said:
ohhhhhh yes because m(m-1)(m-2)(m-3)! ... is part of the expression so wouldn't (n-k)! just be n! ? (-k+n)! how does that get k! ?
It doesn't get ##k!## .

You have (on the right hand side) :

##(n-k)!\,k! \ ## to start with. Then you get the following.

##(n-k)\cdot (n-k-1)!\,k! \ ##

Now regroup (associative law) and then use the commutative law. to get ##(n-k)## to the end of the expression. Right?

They are using the brackets ##[ \ \ ]## simply to indicate what is common to both sides of the equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #17
(Now regroup (associative law) and then use the commutative law. to get (n−k) to the end of the expression. Right?) i don't understand this part
 
  • #18
homeworkhelpls said:
(Now regroup (associative law) and then use the commutative law. to get (n−k) to the end of the expression. Right?) i don't understand this part
It's difficult to help when your answer generally is that you don't understand. I think we should begin at the beginnning here. The problem statement is that we have ##n, k## such that:
$$\binom n k = \binom n {k+1}$$And we want to find the relationship between ##n## and ##k##.

As a first step, can you write down that binomial equation in terms of factorials?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #19
homeworkhelpls said:
"Now regroup (associative law) and then use the commutative law. to get (n−k) to the end of the expression. Right?"
i don't understand this part
It's hard to get more basic than that, but I'll try. Don't take the following explanation as an insult to your intelligence .

Consider the product: ##\displaystyle \ \ a\cdot b\cdot c## .

According to "Order of Operations" you are to take ##a## times ##b## and then take that result times ##c## . We can write that more explicitly with parentheses as ##\displaystyle \ \ (a\cdot b)\cdot c## .

Applying the Associative Law of Multiplication, we can change the order of multiplications without altering the result. This is also referred to as "regrouping". So we now have:

##\displaystyle \ \ (a\cdot b)\cdot c=a\cdot (b\cdot c)##

Multiplication of real numbers is commutative, so now apply the Commutative Law.

##\displaystyle \ \ a\cdot (b\cdot c)=(b\cdot c)\cdot a## .

That explains how to go from ##\displaystyle (n-k)\cdot (n-k-1)!\,k! \ ## to ##\displaystyle \left[ (n-k-1)!\,k!\,\right ] \,(n-k)\ ##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #20
PeroK said:
It's difficult to help when your answer generally is that you don't understand. I think we should begin at the beginnning here. The problem statement is that we have ##n, k## such that:
$$\binom n k = \binom n {k+1}$$And we want to find the relationship between ##n## and ##k##.

As a first step, can you write down that binomial equation in terms of factorials?
n + k = n + k + 1
 
  • #21
homeworkhelpls said:
n + k = n + k + 1
I'm not sure how to respond to that. Where and how are you studying mathematics? If are an undergraduate student you may need to talk to your tutor or a professor about being too far out of your depth.

We can only really help you with things if you have some understanding of the material.

Sorry I can't be more constructive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #22
homeworkhelpls said:
n + k = n + k + 1
Hi @homeworkhelpls. Do you see any problem in posting “n + k = n + k + 1”?
Can you explain why you wrote it?

Note that there are different symbols (for the number of combinations of n items taken k at a time): ## C(n,k)## or ##^nC_k## or ##_nC_k## or ##\binom n k##. You used (n,k). But they all mean the same thing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
  • #23
Hint 4! = 3!×4
 
  • #24
malawi_glenn said:
Hint 4! = 3!×4
you mean 4! = 4(3)(2)(1)! ?
 
  • #25
homeworkhelpls said:
you mean 4! = 4(3)(2)(1)! ?
4! =4×3×2×1 and 3! = 3×2×1 thus 4! = 4×3!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
  • #26
homeworkhelpls said:
ohhhhhh yes because m(m-1)(m-2)(m-3)! ... is part of the expression so wouldn't (n-k)! just be n! ? (-k+n)! how does that get k! ?
I misread your answer in the above post.

Yes, you are correct regarding: ##m!=m(m-1)(m-2)(m-3)\dots (3)(2)(1)##

So that ##m!=(m)(m-1)!##.
Note that hidden in the above is that
##(m-1)(m-2)(m-3) . . . (3)(2)(1)=(m-1)((m-1)-1)((m-1)-2)((m-1)-3) . . .(3)(2)(1)##

Now, since ##m!=(m)(m-1)!## , then it follows that if ##m## is replaced by ##(n-k)## you get the following.

##(n-k)!=(n-k)\cdot((n-k)-1)!##

##\quad\quad\quad =(n-k)\cdot(n-k-1)! ##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K