MHB How Do You Calculate Sample Size for a T-Test with a 95% Confidence Interval?

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
View attachment 7546

i am stuck on question 12

I am trying to use the hypothesis testing 1 sample t test formula .

the right answer is 338 but I can not get this
 

Attachments

  • WIN_20171118_10_55_32_Pro.jpg
    WIN_20171118_10_55_32_Pro.jpg
    92.3 KB · Views: 119
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think this question has to do with the lower bound of the confidence interval since the mean of the sample is above 100. What is the formula you've been given to calculate a confidence interval of a mean? What values do we already have that fit into that equation?
 
So the forumula is x-u/(s/✓n). Where X is the value 101.6

U is the mean which is 100,s is the standard deviation which is 15 , n is the size of the sample which is what we are looking for. What I'm not sure is what I am supposed to equal this to. I know it's something to do with the 5% level of confidence, but that forumula gives its answer as a z value.
 
markosheehan said:
So the forumula is x-u/(s/✓n). Where X is the value 101.6

U is the mean which is 100,s is the standard deviation which is 15 , n is the size of the sample which is what we are looking for. What I'm not sure is what I am supposed to equal this to. I know it's something to do with the 5% level of confidence, but that forumula gives its answer as a z value.

On the right track!

So here's our confidence interval formula: $$\overline{x} \pm t^{*} \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$$.

Like you wrote, we just care about the lower bound so we can ignore the upper bound for now. The $t$ here corresponds to the 95% confidence level. Usually we say when $n>30$ we can use the normal distribution which would make $t=1.96$. If we plug that in we get:

$$100 = 101.6 -1.96 \frac{15}{\sqrt{n}}$$

Now we want to solve for $n$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top