How do you calculate the pH of 35.0-mL of 0.15M acetic acid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eclair_de_XII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid Ph
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the pH of a 35.0 mL solution of 0.150 M acetic acid (CH3COOH) during titration with 0.150 M NaOH. The key equations used include the acid dissociation constant (Ka = 1.8 × 10-5) and the pH formula (pH = -log[H+]). Initial calculations yielded a pH of 2.069, which was incorrect compared to the expected value of 2.78. Participants emphasized the importance of using concentrations rather than moles for equilibrium calculations and suggested applying the "x-is-small" approximation for simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of acid-base titration principles
  • Familiarity with the acid dissociation constant (Ka)
  • Knowledge of pH calculations and logarithmic functions
  • Ability to apply equilibrium concepts in chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the "x-is-small" approximation in acid-base equilibria
  • Learn about the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation for buffer solutions
  • Explore titration curves and their significance in acid-base chemistry
  • Review the derivation and application of the quadratic formula in chemical equilibria
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in analytical chemistry, particularly those focusing on acid-base titrations and equilibrium calculations.

Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91

Homework Statement


"A 35.0-mL sample of 0.150 M acetic acid (CH3COOH) os titrated with 0.150 M NaOH solution. Calculate the pH after the following volumes of base have been added: (a) 0 mL, (b) 17.5 mL, (c) 34.5 mL, (d) 35.0 mL, (f) 50.0 mL."

Homework Equations


Ka = [H+][A-]/[HA]
Ka = 1.8 ⋅ 10-5
x = ½(-b ± √(b2 - 4ac)
pH = -log[H+]
pH = 2.78 (from back of book)

The Attempt at a Solution


0.15 mol/L ⋅ 1 L/1000 mL ⋅ 35.0 mL = 5.25 ⋅ 10-3 mol HAc
1.8 ⋅ 10-5 = (x)(x)/(5.25 ⋅ 10-3 - x)
x2 + 1.8 ⋅ 10-5x - 9.45 ⋅ 10-8 = 0
x = ½(-1.8 ⋅ 10-5 ± √3.24 ⋅ 10-10 - 37.8 ⋅ 10-8)
x = 2.99 ⋅ 10-4 mol H+

[H+] = (2.99 ⋅ 10-4 mol H+)/(0.0350 L) = 8.54 ⋅ 10-3 M
-log(8.54 ⋅ 10-3) = 2.069 ≠ 2.78

This is rather an unorthodox, and thus, unreliable method of finding the initial pH of the acetic acid solution. But I couldn't find any other way to do it... Could someone tell me if I'm doing this problem right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't do equilibrium calculations using Ka (which is a concentration constant) and ignoring the concentrations. Why do you convert to number of moles, instead of using concentrations throughout the calculations?
 
Eclair_de_XII said:

Homework Statement


"A 35.0-mL sample of 0.150 M acetic acid (CH3COOH) os titrated with 0.150 M NaOH solution. Calculate the pH after the following volumes of base have been added: (a) 0 mL, (b) 17.5 mL, (c) 34.5 mL, (d) 35.0 mL, (f) 50.0 mL."

Homework Equations


Ka = [H+][A-]/[HA]
Ka = 1.8 ⋅ 10-5
x = ½(-b ± √(b2 - 4ac)
pH = -log[H+]
pH = 2.78 (from back of book)

The Attempt at a Solution


0.15 mol/L ⋅ 1 L/1000 mL ⋅ 35.0 mL = 5.25 ⋅ 10-3 mol HAc
1.8 ⋅ 10-5 = (x)(x)/(5.25 ⋅ 10-3 - x)
x2 + 1.8 ⋅ 10-5x - 9.45 ⋅ 10-8 = 0
x = ½(-1.8 ⋅ 10-5 ± √3.24 ⋅ 10-10 - 37.8 ⋅ 10-8)
x = 2.99 ⋅ 10-4 mol H+

[H+] = (2.99 ⋅ 10-4 mol H+)/(0.0350 L) = 8.54 ⋅ 10-3 M
-log(8.54 ⋅ 10-3) = 2.069 ≠ 2.78

This is rather an unorthodox, and thus, unreliable method of finding the initial pH of the acetic acid solution. But I couldn't find any other way to do it... Could someone tell me if I'm doing this problem right?

I don't think the approach is unorthodox except as below. I think there is only an arithmetical/algebraic mistake. Your square root is written without right bracketing and you have got wrong sign in the -4ac term. Probably you will get the right answer if you correct that.

Where it is not wrong but unorthodox is there is a bit of unnecessary calculation.

Orthodox would be to say that [H+] is very much smaller than total acid, and therefore you can approximate the denominator of your equilibrium equation by total acid concentration [HAc] = 0.15. Then your calculation reduces to taking a square root rather than solving a quadratic. Do it both ways and you will see they are close. You can if you wish, with benefit, look into the algebra and see why.

The point is this: all this family of problems (the most frequent single one on this part of this forum) are solved using a handful of principles: mass conservation, charge conservation, equilibrium laws, I think that's all... plus use of approximations. Don't think of it as Important Laws and then, oh yes, also get rough answer quicker if approximate. No, the appropriate approximations, understanding them, and how to use them and why and when and how good and sufficient they may be depending on situations, is an essential part of what you have to think about, grasp and learn!

In most cases if you have a quadratic or higher equation you have missed a possibility of approximation. (Of course if the physical nature of the problem requires it, e.g. some equilibria with two protonation etc. polynomials may be of the essence.)
 
epenguin said:
Probably you will get the right answer if you correct that.

I think he will not - units are wrong. Using number of moles instead of concentrations works when the volumes cancel out, like \frac {C_1}{C_2} = \frac {n_1}{n_2}, but here we have \frac {C_1^2}{C_2} = \frac {n_1^2}{V\times n_2} \neq \frac {n_1^2}{n_2}.

I admit I have not checked numbers, but the logic looks faulty.
 
Okay, I'll try using concentration instead of moles.
 
So I thought the answer was more complicated than it seemed. I just used the initial concentration, and used the "x-is-small" approximation.

1.8 ⋅ 10-5 = (x)(x)/(0.15 - x)
1.8 ⋅ 10-5 = (x)(x)/(0.15)
2.7 ⋅ 10-6 = x2
x = 0.00164
-log[H+] = 2.78

Now to figure out the rest of the problem...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K