How Does Quantum Superposition Explain Probability in Wavefunctions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superposition
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Nick R
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am brand new to this stuff and am trying to get my head around it all. I've spent considerable time trying to understand this from Landau's book on the subject (chapter 1 of course).

I bet I'd get more answers by being more brief but I always find that asking the problem carefully sometimes helps me understand the problem better.

A wavefunction, which completely describes the states of a quantum object, can be decomposed in terms of its eigenfunctions,

[tex]\psi = \sum_{n} a_{n}\psi_{n}[/tex]

Eigenvalues (maybe a physical quantity) correspond to the eigenfunctions by

[tex]\widehat{f}\psi_{n} = f_{n}\psi_{n}[/tex]

Where [tex]\widehat{f}[/tex] is the operator that corresponds to the quantity in question.

From this, we see that the value of [tex]a_{n}[/tex] for a given eigenfunction in the decomposition is (somehow) related to the "probability" that the physical quantity [tex]f[/tex] has the value [tex]f_{n}[/tex].

Given, is

[tex]\int |\psi_{n}(q)|^{2}dq = 1[/tex]

and

[tex]\int |\psi(q)|^{2}dq = 1[/tex]

How does it follow that [tex]|a_{n}|^{2}[/tex] is the probability of the physical quantity [tex]f[/tex] having the value [tex]f_{n}[/tex]? The reasoning presented in the book is not clear to me - it is a sort of deductive reasoning that seems like guesswork.

Of course if this is a probability then,

[tex]\sum |a_{n}|^{2} = 1[/tex]

I don't understand how this follows from the other things.

Here is why I am having a problem with this:

I can see it all works if the following is true:

[tex]\psi = a_{0}\psi_{0} + a_{1}\psi_{1} + ... + a_{n}\psi_{n}[/tex]

[tex]|\psi| = \sqrt{|a_{0}\psi_{0}|^{2} + |a_{1}\psi_{1}|^{2} + ... + |a_{n}\psi_{n}|^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\int |\psi|^{2}dq = \int |a_{0}\psi_{0}|^{2}dq + \int |a_{1}\psi_{1}|^{2}dq + ... + \int |a_{n}\psi_{n}|^{2}dq[/tex]

[tex]= |a_{0}|^{2}\int |\psi_{0}|^{2}dq + |a_{1}|^{2}\int |\psi_{1}|^{2}dq + ... + |a_{n}|^{2}\int |\psi_{n}|^{2}dq[/tex]

Truth of this rests on the truth of two identities for complex numbers.

[tex]|(a+bi)(c+di)|^{2} = |a+bi|^{2}|c+di|^{2} IDENTITY ONE[/tex]
According to my calculations this is true.

[tex]|(a+c) + (b+d)i|^{2} = |a+bi|^{2} + |c+di|^{2} IDENTITY TWO[/tex]
According to my calculations this is false, unless there is a constraint [tex]2ac = -2bd[/tex].

What is going on here? Is there some sort of constraint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your missing piece of information is that the [itex]\psi_n[/itex] are orthogonal, that is,

[tex]\int \psi^*_m(q) \psi_n(q) dq = 0[/tex]

for [itex]m \ne n[/itex].

This is what let's you go from

[tex] \psi = a_{0}\psi_{0} + a_{1}\psi_{1} + ... + a_{n}\psi_{n}[/tex]

to

[tex] \int |\psi|^{2}dq = \int |a_{0}\psi_{0}|^{2}dq + \int |a_{1}\psi_{1}|^{2}dq + ... + \int |a_{n}\psi_{n}|^{2}dq[/tex]
 
Thanks I think that makes a lot of sense.

Basically "cross terms" looking similar to

[tex]\psi^*_m(q) \psi_n(q)[/tex]

arise in the expression for [tex]|\psi|^{2}[/tex], and are eliminated when they are integrated, leaving only the terms looking like

[tex]\psi^*_n(q) \psi_n(q)[/tex]

Thanks a bunch.