How Does the Rotating Wave Approximation Simplify the Density Matrix Evolution?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the Rotating Wave Approximation (RWA) and its impact on the density matrix evolution of a two-level system. It highlights the transformation from the original frame to the rotating frame, simplifying the time derivative of the density matrix's diagonal element. The key point is that while the off-diagonal elements acquire a time-dependent phase, the diagonal elements remain unchanged, which is crucial for the RWA's application. The confusion arises from the presence of extra terms when attempting to factor out the exponential, indicating a misunderstanding of the transformation process. The RWA effectively simplifies calculations by eliminating rapidly oscillating terms, allowing for a clearer analysis of the system's dynamics.
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
In a text, it introduces an rotating frame and applies it on evolution of density matrix of two-level system. In the original frame, the first diagonal element of the time-derivitative of density matrix gives

\frac{d\rho_{11}}{dt} = i e^{i\omega_r t} K \rho_{21} - i e^{-i\omega_r t} K^* <br /> \rho_{12}^*

In rotating frame of freq \omega_r, it gives

\frac{d\rho_{11}}{dt} = i K \rho_{21} - i K^* \rho_{12}^*

I don't really understand how to get above result. In my opinion, I will factor out e^{i\omega_r t} such that

\frac{d\rho_{11}}{dt} = i e^{i\omega_r t}\left[ K \rho_{21} - e^{-i2\omega_r t} K^* \rho_{12}^*\right]

and now in the rotating frame, it gives
\frac{d\rho_{11}}{dt} = i \left[ K \rho_{21} - e^{-i2\omega_r t} K^* \rho_{12}^*\right]

But there are some extra term e^{-i2\omega_r t} left, I know this is not the correct result but how to get the correct one?

By the way, in the text, seems like it only consider the off-diagonal density matrix element is of the form e^{i\omega_r t}\rho_{12} or e^{-i\omega_r t}\rho_{21} but let all diagonal term unchanged (i.e. no e^{\pmi\omega_r t}), why is that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first step in the RWA is to go to the rotating reference frame, which is a unitary transform. This is not the same a removing a global complex phase.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3585
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K