How does the substitution x = 1/z transform Bessel's Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The substitution x = 1/z transforms Bessel's Equation into a new form that reveals different singular points. By letting w(z) = u(1/z) and differentiating both sides with respect to z, the transformed equation becomes w´´(z) + (2/z - 1/z²)z*w´(z) + (1/z⁴)(1 - n²z²)w(z). It is crucial to ensure that the derivatives of w are taken with respect to z, not x, and to correct the prefactor in the second term to maintain a single power of z. This transformation is essential for analyzing the behavior of Bessel functions near singular points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bessel's Equation and its standard form.
  • Familiarity with differential equations and their transformations.
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in calculus.
  • Ability to differentiate functions with respect to different variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Bessel's Equation and its solutions.
  • Learn about singular points in differential equations.
  • Explore the implications of variable substitutions in differential equations.
  • Investigate the properties of Bessel functions and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are studying differential equations, particularly those focusing on Bessel's functions and their applications in various fields.

Philip Land
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
Hi!

When we want to look at different singular points for e.g Bessel's eq. $$u´´(x) + \frac{u'(x)}{x} + (1- \frac{n^2}{x^2})u(x)$$.

We usually evaluate the equation letting x= 1/z. But I don't algebraically see how such a substitution ends up with $$w´´(z) +( \frac{2}{z}- \frac{1}{z^2})z*w'(z) + \frac{1}{z^4}(1- n^2 z^2)w(z)$$.

Letting x= 1/z, and derive both sides gives ##1/z^2 z'## but I simply don't know how to go from u(x) to w(z) which is very central and should be very basic and just one microstep in long calculations lol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is assumed that ##w(z) = u(1/z)##. Differentiate both sides with respect to ##z## (two times) and insert into Bessel's differential equation and you should end up with something that looks like your last expression. However, note that your second term cannot be correct as the prefactor needs to have only a single power of ##z##. Also note that the derivatives of ##w## are with respect to ##z##, not with respect to ##x##. (Or rather, ##w'## denotes the derivative of ##w## as a function, i.e., the derivative with respect to the argument of the function.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K