How Fast Can Two Blocks Move Without Sliding Apart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chris097
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
3 replies · 6K views
chris097
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

The coefficient of static friction is 0.636 between the two blocks shown. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.138. Force F causes both blocks to cross a distance of 7.00 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which the motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block, if the mass of the lower block is 1.14 kg and the mass of the upper block is 2.80 kg?

http://capa.physics.mcmaster.ca/figures/kn/Graph08/kn-pic0832.png


The attempt at a solution

Fmax= UsN
=(.636)(2.80*9.81)
=17.4696 N

F(bottom) = UkN
= (.138)((2.80 + 1.14) * 9.81)
=5.3339

Fnet = 17.4696 - 5.3339
=12.1357

F=ma
a=F/m
=12.1357/(1.14+2.8)
=3.0801

d=v1*t + .5at^2
t=square root of (d/(.5a))
= square root of (7/(.5(3.0801)))
=2.13 s


where am i going wrong?
thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
chris097 said:
Fmax= UsN
=(.636)(2.80*9.81)
=17.4696 N

F(bottom) = UkN
= (.138)((2.80 + 1.14) * 9.81)
=5.3339

Fnet = 17.4696 - 5.3339
=12.1357

this is the maximum net force that can accelerate the bottom block.
you should consider only the acceleration of the bottom block
in your next calculation.
 
Thank you.

But what do you mean consider on the bottom block. Do you mean use only the weight of the bottom block?
 
chris097 said:
Thank you.

But what do you mean consider on the bottom block. Do you mean use only the weight of the bottom block?

yes. Since you found the maximum net force on the bottom block, then you need to use the mass and the acceleration of the bottom block as well in F = ma