How much of an approximation are power measuring tools for martial arts?

In summary: I don't know. I imagine it would be pretty powerful, but I wouldn't want to use it.In summary, this Power Cube device is capable of reporting EXACTLY how hard Francis Ngannou punched, but it is biased towards mass or speed and may overestimate one of the components. It is new technology, and is not comparable to other instruments. My daughter was in martial arts for many years and could break 4 boards stacked together with one fist punch, but if she hit the target at the same place every time it would be inaccurate.
  • #1
Username34
23
7
For instance this Power Cube device.

Is it capable of reporting EXACTLY how hard Francis Ngannou punched, or will it be biased towards mass or speed and overestimate one of the components?

How "off" from the actual physics of reality do you expect such a tool to be? 5%? 10%? 20%?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Username34 said:
EXACTLY
No. No instrument is exact. All have uncertainties.

Further "how hard they punched" is not a physical term. Force? Pressure? Impulse? Something else?
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #3
Username34 said:
Is it capable of reporting EXACTLY how hard Francis Ngannou punched, or will it be biased towards mass or speed and overestimate one of the components?

How "off" from the actual physics of reality do you expect such a tool to be? 5%? 10%? 20%?
I don't think there's an accepted "actual physics" measure of how "hard" a punch is, so that device picks something and measures that. I'm speculating that it measures the displacement over time of a collection of strong springs or springy pads, and calculates energy and power from that. I'd expect it to be pretty accurate (<5% should be possible) for what it is measuring.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #4
Username34 said:
For instance this Power Cube device.

Is it capable of reporting EXACTLY how hard Francis Ngannou punched, or will it be biased towards mass or speed and overestimate one of the components?

How "off" from the actual physics of reality do you expect such a tool to be? 5%? 10%? 20%?

My daughter was in martial arts for many years. If I remember correctly, it really depended where she hit the target. IMO, I'd say 20% or more.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #5
dlgoff said:
My daughter was in martial arts for many years. If I remember correctly, it really depended where she hit the target. IMO, I'd say 20% or more.
That sounds more like an inaccurate punch than an inaccurate measurement to me.
 
  • Haha
Likes dlgoff
  • #6
russ_watters said:
That sounds more like an inaccurate punch than an inaccurate measurement to me.
Trust me. She wasn't inaccurate. She could break 4 boards stacked together with one fist punch. Had to be accurate for that.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes nsaspook and russ_watters
  • #7
russ_watters said:
I don't think there's an accepted "actual physics" measure of how "hard" a punch is, so that device picks something and measures that. I'm speculating that it measures the displacement over time of a collection of strong springs or springy pads, and calculates energy and power from that. I'd expect it to be pretty accurate (<5% should be possible) for what it is measuring.
My question was regarding power.
 
  • #8
dlgoff said:
My daughter was in martial arts for many years. If I remember correctly, it really depended where she hit the target. IMO, I'd say 20% or more.

This is brand new technology, so no not comparable.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #9
"That sounds more like an inaccurate punch than an inaccurate measurement to me."
Well, I kept some of the boards she broke:
smallboards.JPG
 
Last edited:
  • #10
dlgoff said:
She could break 4 boards stacked together with one fist punch.
Is this the same dainty daughter who likes flying planes upside down?
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
Is this the same dainty daughter who likes flying planes upside down?
Yes!

@berkeman
BTW. She is teaching 4 other girl students now that she is a CFI (Certified Flying Instructor)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Borek, BillTre, russ_watters and 1 other person
  • #12
russ_watters said:
I don't think there's an accepted "actual physics" measure of how "hard" a punch is
Why would mechanical power be a good enough definition?
 
  • #13
Username34 said:
Why would mechanical power be a good enough definition?
I don't love it, I think I'd prefer energy. @dlgoff 's daughter surely knows that it's energy that breaks a board, not power.
 
  • #14
dlgoff said:
Trust me. She wasn't inaccurate. She could break 4 boards stacked together with one fist punch. Had to be accurate for that.
Look, I'm not trying to be a jerk about it, but you said she wasn't hitting the target at the same place every time.
 
  • #15
russ_watters said:
I don't love it, I think I'd prefer energy. @dlgoff 's daughter surely knows that it's energy that breaks a board, not power.
Yes. You are correct.
 
  • #16
russ_watters said:
Look, I'm not trying to be a jerk about it, but you said she wasn't hitting the target at the same place every time.
No. I said she had to be accurate. Meaning, she had to hit right in the center of the four boards. I saved a few of the boards she broke:
smallboards.JPG
 
  • #17
dlgoff said:
I said she had to be accurate. Meaning, she had to hit right in the center of the four boards.
That, and hitting hard enough while using her hand correctly. I once spent a fun afternoon showing friends how to punch out windows in an abandoned building that was being demolished. Hit (leather gloves required) hard enough with the correct knuckle, and the window shattered with no pain on my part. Hit not quite hard enough, or with the hand slightly out of position, resulted in pain and an unbroken window.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #18
dlgoff said:
My daughter was in martial arts for many years.
Gives new meaning to the term "striking beauty".
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Tom.G, BillTre, dlgoff and 1 other person
  • #19
How powerful do you guys think is on a powercube?
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #20
Username34 said:
Is it capable of reporting EXACTLY how hard Francis Ngannou punched, or will it be biased towards mass or speed and overestimate one of the components?

How "off" from the actual physics of reality do you expect such a tool to be? 5%? 10%? 20%?
Username34 said:
Why would mechanical power be a good enough definition?
It may be helpful for you to do a Google search for helmet impact testing methods to see what-all is used for certifying helmet designs. The purpose of a helmet is obviously to protect the head from real-world impacts as much as possible, and they will use certain test techniques to quantify that protection level.

In a sense, you are asking the opposite question, but the helmet test standards are targeted at real-world impacts to the head that can cause damage to the person. Some of the test standards record the peak acceleration, but other tests use other techniques.

And since the motion of the head during impact also makes a difference for damage, it would probably be better if that test cube thing used a simulated head instead of being mounted rigidly. Just the Medic in me talking out loud...
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #21
dlgoff said:
"That sounds more like an inaccurate punch than an inaccurate measurement to me."
Well, I kept some of the boards she broke:
View attachment 330132
Yes, and you'll notice that all the boards are broken WITH the grain, which is actually pretty easy. The test is if you can break even one board across the grain. You are right, of course that she had to hit at or near the center to get maximum leverage on the board.

As far as I'm aware, no martial arts board breaking is every done across the grain.
 
  • #22
phinds said:
As far as I'm aware, no martial arts board breaking is every done across the grain.
What about the concrete breaking demos...
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #23
berkeman said:
What about the concrete breaking demos...
She did a little of that, but if I remember correctly, she used a palm strike (heal of hand), not a knuckle strike.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #24
berkeman said:
What about the concrete breaking demos...
They don't have any grain direction. I'm not suggesting that martial arts breaking of stuff is fake or anything, just that wooden breaks are always with the grain.

When I took Tae Kwan Do about 100 years ago, I brought home some of the pine boards to show my kid. I broke three stacked together (supported at both ends but not in the middle) and he was impressed.

Then I took the one I had put aside, which I could tell was the weakest of the lot, and I broke it just by gripping my fingers over the edges and then pressing the center with my thumbs. I am not particularly strong. I was showing him how pine boards break with the grain very easily.

Then I took one of my own that I had cut to the same length as the others but with the grain running along the length, not cross-grain, and smashed it in the center with a sledge mallet and all I did was dent it.

My lesson for him was not about martial arts, it was a graphic demonstration of the differences in wood strength across the grain and with the grain.
 
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, Lnewqban, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #27
berkeman said:
It may be helpful for you to do a Google search for helmet impact testing methods to see what-all is used for certifying helmet designs. The purpose of a helmet is obviously to protect the head from real-world impacts as much as possible, and they will use certain test techniques to quantify that protection level.

In a sense, you are asking the opposite question, but the helmet test standards are targeted at real-world impacts to the head that can cause damage to the person. Some of the test standards record the peak acceleration, but other tests use other techniques.

And since the motion of the head during impact also makes a difference for damage, it would probably be better if that test cube thing used a simulated head instead of being mounted rigidly. Just the Medic in me talking out loud...
Which is more crucial for power in terms of baseline mass - a heavy fist (big bone density) or a heavy arm with regular sized fist? Francis Ngannou has very big arms but his fist can't compare to this guy..

 
  • Wow
Likes dlgoff

FAQ: How much of an approximation are power measuring tools for martial arts?

How accurate are power measuring tools in martial arts?

Power measuring tools in martial arts can provide a reasonable approximation of striking power, but their accuracy can vary based on the quality of the device and the conditions under which they are used. They are generally good for relative comparisons rather than precise measurements.

What factors can affect the readings from power measuring tools?

Several factors can affect the readings, including the type of surface being struck, the angle of the strike, the consistency of the striking technique, and the calibration of the tool. Environmental conditions like temperature and humidity can also play a role.

Are power measuring tools useful for training purposes?

Yes, power measuring tools can be very useful for training purposes. They provide immediate feedback, which can help martial artists adjust their techniques to maximize power. However, they should be used as a supplementary tool rather than the sole focus of training.

Can power measuring tools differentiate between different types of strikes?

Some advanced power measuring tools can differentiate between different types of strikes, such as punches, kicks, and elbow strikes. However, simpler devices may only provide a general measure of impact force without distinguishing between strike types.

How do power measuring tools compare to other methods of measuring martial arts performance?

Power measuring tools offer a direct and quantifiable way to measure striking force, which can be more objective than subjective assessments by coaches or practitioners. However, they do not capture other important aspects of martial arts performance, such as speed, technique, and tactical skill.

Similar threads

Back
Top