MHB How to Calculate the Sum of 5-Digit Numbers Using Specific Digits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total sum of 5-digit numbers formed from specific digits, including cases with and without repetition. Participants express confusion about handling repeated digits and how to calculate sums in different scenarios. The main cases identified include distinct digits, two identical digits, and two pairs of identical digits. The need for clarification on the calculation methods for these cases is emphasized. Overall, the conversation seeks guidance on accurately summing these combinations.
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
The Total Sum of $5$ Digit no. which can be formed with the Digit $0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4,5,6$

[a] without Repetition of Digit.

with Repetition of Digit
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jacks said:
The Total Sum of $5$ Digit no. which can be formed with the Digit $0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4,5,6$

[a] without Repetition of Digit.

with Repetition of Digit


Hi jacks, :)

I don't understand why you have repeated the digits. Is your problem,

"Find the Total sum of $5$ digit numbers which can be formed with the digits $0,1,2,3,4,5,6$" ?
 
Oh Sorry Sudhakara The question is The Sum of $5$ Digit no. using the Digi $1,2,2,3,4,5,5$

My Try: I have formed Three cases

(I) When all Digits are Distinct

(II) When Two are same like $22134,22135,12355,12455$

(II) When two are of one kind and other two are of other kind. like $2255$

But I Did not Understand How can I calculate sum in (II) and (III) cases.

please help me . Thanks
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K