How to Determine Significant Figures in Multiplication/Division?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter parabolic1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significant digits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining significant figures in multiplication and division, specifically addressing the calculation of 0.00420 x 60. It is established that the number 0.00420 has three significant figures, while the integer 60 typically has one significant figure unless it is used as an exact conversion factor. The conclusion is that without additional context indicating that 60 is an exact number, the answer should reflect the lowest number of significant figures, resulting in 0.3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of significant figures in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of multiplication and division
  • Familiarity with the concept of exact numbers versus measured numbers
  • Ability to interpret mathematical context in problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the rules of significant figures in addition and subtraction
  • Learn about the implications of using exact numbers in calculations
  • Study examples of significant figures in scientific measurements
  • Explore common pitfalls in determining significant figures in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in scientific fields who require a clear understanding of significant figures in calculations, particularly in chemistry and physics.

parabolic1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
just a quick question... (not a HW question)

i know that when you do multiplication/division between numbers you take the lowest amount of sig figs of the two and apply it to your answer... HOWEVER:

what would be the answer for a question such as:

0.00420 x 60 = ?

the first part has 3 sig figs, while the second part has 1... although I've heard you don't count whole integers, so would the answer be

0.252 or 0.3 ?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "60" is ambiguous. For example if you are converting from minutes to seconds, 60 is exact, so it has to be treated as having infinite significant digits. To answer your question you need more context.
 
Since there's no decimal point with the '60', it has 1 significant digit.
 
Andy Resnick said:
Since there's no decimal point with the '60', it has 1 significant digit.

On the other hand, if the 60 is meant to be a conversion factor (i.e, between minutes and seconds, or hours and minutes), then it is to be treated as an exact number that doesn't limit the significant figures.

But yes, if it's just part of the data then 1 significant figure, definitely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K