How to obtain three consecutive integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding three consecutive integers, specifically 350, 351, and 352, that satisfy the conditions \(5^2 \mid a\), \(3^3 \mid (a+1)\), and \(2^4 \mid (a+2)\). The Chinese Remainder Theorem is applied to derive the solution, confirming that \(a \equiv 350\), \(a+1 \equiv 351\), and \(a+2 \equiv 352\). The choice of the primes (5, 3, 2) is justified as the smallest distinct integers that meet the divisibility requirements, ensuring the solution is both valid and minimal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic and congruences
  • Familiarity with the Chinese Remainder Theorem
  • Knowledge of prime factorization and divisibility rules
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Chinese Remainder Theorem in-depth
  • Explore modular arithmetic applications in number theory
  • Learn about prime factorization techniques
  • Investigate other methods for solving systems of congruences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, educators teaching modular arithmetic, and anyone interested in solving integer problems involving divisibility.

Math100
Messages
817
Reaction score
230
Homework Statement
Obtain three consecutive integers, the first of which is divisible by a square, the second by a cube, and the third by a fourth power.
Relevant Equations
None.
Let ## a, a+1 ## and ## a+2 ## be the three consecutive integers.
Then
\begin{align*}
&5^{2}\mid a\implies a\equiv 0\pmod {25}\\
&3^{3}\mid (a+1)\implies a+1\equiv 0\pmod {27}\implies a\equiv 26\pmod {9}\\
&2^{4}\mid (a+2)\implies a+2\equiv 0\pmod {16}\implies a\equiv 14\pmod {16}.\\
\end{align*}
Applying the Chinese Remainder Theorem produces:
## n=25\cdot 27\cdot 16=10800 ##.
This means ## N_{1}=\frac{10800}{25}=432, N_{2}=\frac{10800}{27}=400 ## and ## N_{3}=\frac{10800}{16}=675 ##.
Now we have ## 432x_{1}\equiv 1\pmod {25}, 400x_{2}\equiv 1\pmod {27} ## and ## 675x_{3}\equiv 1\pmod {16} ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
&432x_{1}\equiv 1\pmod {25}\implies 7x_{1}\equiv 1\pmod {25}\\
&\implies 49x_{1}\equiv 7\pmod {25}\implies -x_{1}\equiv 7\pmod {25}\\
&\implies x_{1}\equiv 18\pmod {25},\\
&400x_{2}\equiv 1\pmod {27}\implies -5x_{2}\equiv 1\pmod {27}\\
&\implies -25x_{2}\equiv 5\pmod {27}\implies 2x_{2}\equiv 5\pmod {27}\\
&\implies 28x_{2}\equiv 70\pmod {27}\implies x_{2}\equiv 16\pmod {27},\\
&675x_{3}\equiv 1\pmod {16}\implies 3x_{3}\equiv 1\pmod {16}\\
&\implies 15x_{3}\equiv 5\pmod {16}\implies -x_{3}\equiv 5\pmod {16}\\
&\implies x_{3}\equiv 11\pmod {16}.\\
\end{align*}
Since ## x_{1}=18, x_{2}=16 ## and ## x_{3}=11 ##,
it follows that ## x\equiv (0+26\cdot 400\cdot 16+14\cdot 675\cdot 11)\pmod {10800}\equiv 270350\pmod {10800}\equiv 350\pmod {10800} ##.
Thus, ## a=350, a+1=351 ## and ## a+2=352 ##.
Therefore, the three consecutive integers are ## 350, 351 ## and ## 352 ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is correct, but how did you come to choose ##(5,3,2)##? And there is a typo in the second line where you wrote ##\pmod 9## instead of ##\pmod{27}.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
fresh_42 said:
The answer is correct, but how did you come to choose ##(5,3,2)##? And there is a typo in the second line where you wrote ##\pmod 9## instead of ##\pmod{27}.##
I chose ## (5, 3, 2) ## from the book's answer, since it says ## 5^{2}\mid 350, 3^{3}\mid 351 ## and ## 2^{4}\mid 352 ##. But do you know why it should be ## (5, 3, 2) ##? Because honestly, I do not know why. It seems like because all ## 2, 3 ## and ## 5 ## are prime numbers.
 
Math100 said:
I chose ## (5, 3, 2) ## from the book's answer, since it says ## 5^{2}\mid 350, 3^{3}\mid 351 ## and ## 2^{4}\mid 352 ##. But do you know why it should be ## (5, 3, 2) ##? Because honestly, I do not know why. It seems like because all ## 2, 3 ## and ## 5 ## are prime numbers.
We are asked to find ##r^2\,|\,a\, , \,s^3\,|\,(a+1)\,|\,t^4\,|\,(a+2).##

I wonder why they all have to be pairwise distinct. I assume there is a reason, but I haven't looked into it. If so, then ##r,s,t## shouldn't be too far apart to obtain a solution that can be computed without computers. It makes sense to choose ##t## as small as possible in order to keep ##a## small. That gives us ##t^4=16\,|\,(a+2).## Then ##s=3## is the next small number to keep ##s^3## and ##a## possibly small. The only question left is then, should we choose ##r=4## or ##r=5?## But from ##r=4## we would get ##16|a## and ##16|(a+2)## which is impossible.

So ##(5,3,2)## is the smallest possible triple with distinct numbers. And it worked. There are probably more solutions. It is just the smallest one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K