How to prove Kirchhoff's loop rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelvin490
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kirchhoff Loop
Click For Summary
Kirchhoff's loop rule is often illustrated through simple one-loop systems, where the same current flows throughout. However, real circuits may have varying currents in different sections, challenging the notion of electrons returning to the same point. The discussion also touches on the concept that a single point can only have one potential, questioning the possibility of electrons taking different paths with varying energies. To prove the rule, one can start with a single loop, then use mathematical induction to extend the proof to multiple loops. This approach helps clarify the fundamental principles behind Kirchhoff's loop rule.
kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
In common test books the "proof" is usually use an example of a simple one-loop system with battery and resistor. In such a case, the current actually goes round the loop and the same current flows throughout the loop.

However in actual case, there may be different currents in different sections of the loop, no electron actually returns to the same point.

Another way to use the idea that one point can only have one potential, but are there any proof for that? Why it is not possible to have electrons go through different path to have different energy when they pass through the same point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like your understanding and confusion may be more fundamental, but you would prove it in general using induction. Prove it for one loop. Extend that to two loops, and then extend it to n loops...
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K