MHB How to Prove Predicate Logic Validity with Induction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Voehet
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To prove the validity of the given predicate logic argument using induction, one must first clarify the meaning of the symbols, particularly the "!" operator. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing progress in problem-solving to facilitate effective assistance from others. Participants are encouraged to share their attempts and reasoning to avoid redundant suggestions. The thread highlights the need for a structured approach to induction in logic proofs. Overall, the focus is on collaborative learning and clarity in communication to tackle the problem effectively.
Voehet
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How would I go about proving that the argument below is valid using the induction method?
(∃x)[P(x)!Q(x)]^(∀y)[Q(y)!R(y)]^(∀x)P(x)!(∃x)R(x)

Thank you very much in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, Voehet! :D

We ask that our users show their progress when posting questions, and that way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
Voehet said:
How would I go about proving that the argument below is valid using the induction method?
(∃x)[P(x)!Q(x)]^(∀y)[Q(y)!R(y)]^(∀x)P(x)!(∃x)R(x)
What does ! stand for?
 

Thread 'A variant of the Monty Hall problem'

There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...
View full post »

Similar threads

I On the meaning of logical implication within specific context/models
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
I Predicates and Models ... Goldrei
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Is this conditional expectation identity true?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Syntactic vs semantic logical consequence (entailment)
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB Predicate logic with multiple quantifiers
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Modus Ponens deduction rule
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
I On pdf of a sum of two r.v.s and differentiating under the integral
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Contrapositive of theorem and issue with proof
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Discovering the Useful Denial for Predicates P(x) and Q(x) in Universe U
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB How to Translate 'There Exists Exactly One Happy Person' into Predicate Logic?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K