MHB How to Prove Predicate Logic Validity with Induction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Voehet
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To prove the validity of the given predicate logic argument using induction, one must first clarify the meaning of the symbols, particularly the "!" operator. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing progress in problem-solving to facilitate effective assistance from others. Participants are encouraged to share their attempts and reasoning to avoid redundant suggestions. The thread highlights the need for a structured approach to induction in logic proofs. Overall, the focus is on collaborative learning and clarity in communication to tackle the problem effectively.
Voehet
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How would I go about proving that the argument below is valid using the induction method?
(∃x)[P(x)!Q(x)]^(∀y)[Q(y)!R(y)]^(∀x)P(x)!(∃x)R(x)

Thank you very much in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, Voehet! :D

We ask that our users show their progress when posting questions, and that way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
Voehet said:
How would I go about proving that the argument below is valid using the induction method?
(∃x)[P(x)!Q(x)]^(∀y)[Q(y)!R(y)]^(∀x)P(x)!(∃x)R(x)
What does ! stand for?
 

Thread 'Two interesting number theory tricks'

First trick I learned this one a long time ago and have used it to entertain and amuse young kids. Ask your friend to write down a three-digit number without showing it to you. Then ask him or her to rearrange the digits to form a new three-digit number. After that, write whichever is the larger number above the other number, and then subtract the smaller from the larger, making sure that you don't see any of the numbers. Then ask the young "victim" to tell you any two of the digits of the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Undergrad On the meaning of logical implication within specific context/models
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Undergrad Predicates and Models ... Goldrei
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad Is this conditional expectation identity true?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Syntactic vs semantic logical consequence (entailment)
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB Predicate logic with multiple quantifiers
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Modus Ponens deduction rule
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Undergrad On pdf of a sum of two r.v.s and differentiating under the integral
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Contrapositive of theorem and issue with proof
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Discovering the Useful Denial for Predicates P(x) and Q(x) in Universe U
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB How to Translate 'There Exists Exactly One Happy Person' into Predicate Logic?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K