How to Solve for \(x\) and \(y\) in a System of Linear ODEs?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kalish1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Odes System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the system of linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) represented by $$\frac{dx}{dt} + \frac{dy}{dt}=a-(b+c+d)y-bx.$$ Participants emphasize that with two unknown functions, \(x(t)\) and \(y(t)\), and only one equation, one can express one variable in terms of the other. The approach discussed involves solving for \(U\) and \(V\) sequentially, where \(U\) and \(V\) are derived from the original equation. The strategy of substituting \(U\) into the equation for \(V\) is highlighted as a potentially effective method to derive a solvable equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with substitution methods in differential equations
  • Knowledge of function notation and derivatives
  • Basic concepts of nonlinear systems in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the method of solving linear ODEs using substitution techniques
  • Learn about the existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs
  • Explore the implications of nonlinear ODE systems and their solutions
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving systems of differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying differential equations, and researchers working on systems of linear ODEs will benefit from this discussion.

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I want to solve for $x$ and $y$ from the equation $$\frac{dx}{dt} + \frac{dy}{dt}=a-(b+c+d)y-bx.$$

What is the best strategy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kalish said:
I want to solve for $x$ and $y$ from the equation $$\frac{dx}{dt} + \frac{dy}{dt}=a-(b+c+d)y-bx.$$

What is the best strategy?

You have two unknown function x(*) and y(*) and only one equation. That means that You can find x(*) as function of y(*) and y'(*) or vice versa, not both x(*) and y(*)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
You have two unknown function x(*) and y(*) and only one equation. That means that You can find x(*) as function of y(*) and y'(*) or vice versa, not both x(*) and y(*)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

$1.$ I solved for $U$.

$2.$ Then I solved the equation for $V$.

$3.$ Now I am plugging in the expression for $U$ into the equation for $V$ (because it looks easier than plugging in the other way around).

Shouldn't this give me a solvable equation for $V$, thus giving $V$, and then let me plug back into the main equation to get $U$??
 
kalish said:
$1.$ I solved for $U$.

$2.$ Then I solved the equation for $V$.

$3.$ Now I am plugging in the expression for $U$ into the equation for $V$ (because it looks easier than plugging in the other way around).

Shouldn't this give me a solvable equation for $V$, thus giving $V$, and then let me plug back into the main equation to get $U$??

Could you please explain what $U$ and $V$ are? I think it'd also be terrific if you could please provide more context for this problem. How did this problem come to you? Is there any other information you have?
 
Ackbach said:
Could you please explain what $U$ and $V$ are? I think it'd also be terrific if you could please provide more context for this problem. How did this problem come to you? Is there any other information you have?

Sure. I have provided the full details in the following 3 links:
differential equations - Solution to system of nonlinear ODEs - Mathematics Stack Exchange
differential equations - System of $2$ nonlinear DEs - Mathematics Stack Exchange
differential equations - Solving a system of linear ODEs - Mathematics Stack Exchange

People have largely been unable to help. I hope you can help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K