MHB Identity Function: Definition, Examples & Properties

  • Thread starter Thread starter dana1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Identity
AI Thread Summary
The identity function is defined as a function that maps every element of a set to itself, denoted as $id_A: A \to A$. It is characterized as a bijection, meaning it is both injective and surjective. The composition of the identity function with any other function $f$ results in the original function, expressed as $f \circ id_A = f$. The discussion highlights that the identity function maintains the properties of bijections when composed with other functions. Understanding the identity function is crucial for grasping more complex function properties in mathematics.
dana1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hey,
question is attached

thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • question2.png
    question2.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 111
Physics news on Phys.org
dana said:
hey,
question is attached

thanks in advance!

Hi dana!

Well... since $id_A: A\to A$ is a bijection, it seems fair to me that $f \circ g: A \to A$ given by $f \circ g: a \mapsto a$ is also a bijection...
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top