Infinite or Finite: Examining Line Segments

AI Thread Summary
A line segment contains an infinite number of points, making it an infinite set in terms of its elements. However, this does not affect its geometrical length, which remains finite. The distinction between the infinite nature of the set and the finite measure of length is crucial. Length is a specific measure that does not equate to the cardinality of the set. Thus, while a line segment has infinite points, its overall length is still considered finite.
cam875
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
If you were to describe a line segment as the set where all of its infinite points were individual elements within the set than wouldn't the overall set which is the line segment also be considered infinite and not finite.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cam875 said:
If you were to describe a line segment as the set where all of its infinite points were individual elements within the set than wouldn't the overall set which is the line segment also be considered infinite and not finite.
Yes, as a set containing an "infinite" number of points, it is an infinite set. But that has nothing to do with its length if you were thinking of that as being finite.
 
so its geometrical length is still considered finite although its set is considered infinite?
 
cam875 said:
so its geometrical length is still considered finite although its set is considered infinite?

Length is a specific kind of measure on a set.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics )

This is distinct from the cardinality of the set. The cardinality of informally referred to as the "size" of the set.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top