Interesting talk on history by Furguson

  • Context: History 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhilKravitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History Interesting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Niall Ferguson, a Harvard professor of history, presented a talk on the rapid decline of empires at the Australia Center for Independent Studies. He emphasized that empires can collapse quickly, but his application of chaos theory and complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory was criticized for being overly simplistic. The distinction between viewing collapse as a random event versus a failure of adaptive potential is crucial for understanding political implications. The discussion also referenced Jared Diamond's work on environmental constraints as a significant factor in empire collapse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chaos theory
  • Familiarity with complex adaptive systems (CAS)
  • Knowledge of historical theories on empire collapse
  • Awareness of environmental/resource constraints in historical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research chaos theory applications in historical contexts
  • Explore complex adaptive systems (CAS) in political theory
  • Study Jared Diamond's theories on environmental factors affecting civilizations
  • Analyze case studies of historical empires and their collapse mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Historians, political theorists, students of complexity science, and anyone interested in the dynamics of empire stability and collapse.

PhilKravitz
Harvard professor of history Niall Ferguson gave an interesting talk on history at the Australia Center for Independent Studies

http://fora.tv/2010/07/28/Niall_Ferguson_Empires_on_the_Edge_of_Chaos

His main point was that empires die fast.
 
Science news on Phys.org
An essay on the same is here - http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24874.htm

Unfortunately his use of chaos theory and complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory is mangled almost to the point of parody.

For example, it is two different things to claim the US will fall suddenly because 1) life is essentially chaotic, or 2) fall suddenly because CAS become scelerotic in time and so lose their adaptive potential and ability to respond to pertubative events.

It matters because if you believe 1), then you will see collapse as just bad luck, like the weather, and not something the US can do much about.

But if you believe 2), then you might have a political theory about the need to remain in the lean and still growing phase that can take the knocks and bumps.

Of course then you get into the issue of hard environmental/resource constraints - as Jared Diamond has popularised as the historical reason for sudden empire collapse. And in complexity theory, a boundary constraint ain't a butterfly-wing style perturbation. :smile:

So Ferguson gets a D for his grasp of theoretical principles, even if his heart's in the right place.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K