How to Find E(1/(1 + e^Z)) for a Normally Distributed Z?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hejdun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the expected value E(1/(1 + e^Z)) where Z is a normally distributed random variable. Participants mention that E(e^Z) and E(1/e^Z) follow lognormal and inverse lognormal distributions, respectively. Suggestions for solving the problem include using Taylor expansion and Gauss-Hermite quadrature, although the latter's applicability for an analytical solution is questioned. The conversation highlights the challenge of finding a neat analytical expression for the expected value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normally distributed random variables
  • Familiarity with lognormal and inverse lognormal distributions
  • Knowledge of moment generating functions
  • Basic concepts of numerical integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of lognormal and inverse lognormal distributions
  • Learn about Taylor expansion and its applications in probability
  • Explore Gauss-Hermite quadrature for numerical integration
  • Study analytical techniques for evaluating expected values of functions of random variables
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and data scientists interested in advanced probability theory and the evaluation of expected values involving normally distributed variables.

Hejdun
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am stuck with this problem. I am looking for E(1/(1 + e^Z)) where Z is a normally distributed random variable.

I know that E(e^Z) and E(1/e^Z) follow lognormal and inverse lognormal distibution and the means of these distributions are standard results. Of course, is also easy to find E(e^Z + 1).

However regarding my problem, does anyone have a suggestion of how to proceed? I tried to use the moment generating function but got stuck...

Thanks in advance!
/Hejdun
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry to bump this.

Still no ideas of how to solve this problem?

Of course, I can approximate it using Taylor expansion, but the
resulting expression isn't very nice.

/Hejdun
 
Maybe Gauss-Hermite quadrature will give you a decent approximation?
 
bpet said:
Maybe Gauss-Hermite quadrature will give you a decent approximation?

Yes, the integral may be evaluated numerically,
but I am looking for an analytical answer. I am not sure how the Gauss-Hermite quadrature would help for such a case.

Thanks.

/Hejdun
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K