Is a photonic-boom possible?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter matthewfullhart
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of a "photonic-boom," questioning whether a buildup of light rays could occur similarly to a sonic boom when traveling at relativistic speeds. Participants clarify that the speed of light remains constant relative to any observer, negating the possibility of light buildup. The phenomenon of Čerenkov radiation is introduced as the electromagnetic analogue of a sonic boom, although it is impractical for weaponization. The consensus emphasizes that using projectiles is a more efficient method for delivering damage than attempting to harness light in this manner.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of Čerenkov radiation
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic waves
  • Awareness of projectile motion and its physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Einstein's relativity and its implications on light speed
  • Explore Čerenkov radiation and its applications in physics
  • Study the efficiency of projectiles versus light-based weapons
  • Investigate the physics of shockwaves in different mediums
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of light and relativity.

matthewfullhart
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
is a "photonic-boom" possible?

ok, so I'm sitting in class one day, and my physics teacher is talking about light... and since we had just finished up a section on sound, I was wondering whether there is such an effect as a "light-boom"

that is to say, if we were to have a spaceship that could go exactly at the speed of light, and we attached a flashlight to the front of the ship, could we not cause the buildup of light rays much the same as we can with sound and airplanes? if so, couldn't we make a gigantic weapon with this? let's say that there's life on a planet near alpha centauri, and we go to war with them... couldn't we just send out a ship with a big flashlight on the front, cause the buildup of light particles over the span of 4.3 years, and then decelerate just before hitting the planet? 4.3 years of light would definitely do some amount of damage to their planet, even if it's just blinding everyone on the surface...

I asked my teacher this, and he said something to the effect of "no, because of time dialation." I realize his point, but that makes me wonder how the red shift works, if this effect doesn't...

If anyone knows why this can/can't occur, could you please tell me? it's been bugging me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
could we not cause the buildup of light rays much the same as we can with sound and airplanes?
A "buildup" relative to what? In any case, the speed of light relative to any reference is the speed of light. If you were standing on the bridge of such a spaceship (I'm going to assume moving at 99.9% the speed of light relative to a given planet. If you say "moving at the speed of light" you are rejecting relativity and there is no way to answer your question.) you would see the light rays moving away from you at speed c. If you were standing on that planet watching the ship go by, you would see the light rays moving away from it at speed c. No buildup.
 
the electromagnetic analogue of the sonic boom does indeed occur. it is called Čerenkov radiation.
 
Last edited:
It's impractical (but possible) to create a light shockwave. There are several different methods for doing this.

The method you describe is a bit silly because it would be easier, more efficient, and more damaging to simply accelerate a projectile and let it run into the planet.

Shining a light forward, is inefficient because light loses intensity with the distance cubed, so it's better to keep the projectile solid so that all of the energy in the projectile can be used.
 
There is a phenomenom called Cerenekov radiation, which is caused by particles entering a medium, traveling faster than the speed of light of the medium. The result is a radiation pattern similar to supersonic shock waves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K