Is a proton's movement considered a subject of Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the movement of protons can be considered within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, particularly in the context of classical mechanics and its applicability to systems involving protons in force fields, such as those found in charged capacitors.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the applicability of Newton's Second Law to protons in a quantum context, suggesting that Schrödinger's Equation may be more appropriate.
  • Another participant asserts that classical mechanics serves as the large distance limit of quantum mechanics, indicating that it can be a valid approximation for protons depending on the system.
  • A participant cites the motion of an electron beam in cathode-ray tubes as an example where classical physics suffices for practical applications.
  • Another example provided is that of giant racetrack proton accelerators, where special relativity is necessary, but quantum mechanics is not required.
  • One participant expresses relief at the idea that their use of classical mechanics was a reasonable approximation, seeking further clarification on applying quantum mechanics to similar exercises.
  • Another participant suggests using potential energy and the Schrödinger equation to analyze systems like the hydrogen atom, indicating a method to incorporate quantum mechanics into the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the applicability of classical mechanics versus quantum mechanics for protons, with some arguing for the validity of classical approximations and others advocating for a quantum approach.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of classical mechanics in quantum contexts, the dependence on specific systems, and the unresolved nature of how to transition from classical to quantum descriptions in certain scenarios.

karkas
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
Is a proton's movement considered an object of Quantum Mechanics?

I had this thought a while ago when we were studying movements of protons in a force field, specifically inside the field of a charged capacitor.

The thing is that we used Newton's Second law to find the magnitude of the force exerted to the particle in a specific point. Then I thought "Hey,what the h*ll? Is this possible in a quantum level, isn't it sense-less?"


Am I wrong or right? I asked my sister and she told me this has nothing to do with quantum mechanics. My thought is that we have to use Schrödinger's Equation instead of Newton's. Enlighten me please!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Classical mechanics is the large distance limit of quantum mechanics. It's an approximation for protons and it's an approximation for baseballs. Whether it's a good enough approximation depends on the system at hand and your toleration for inaccuracy. It's entirely possible that it's good enough for the system at hand - particularly in elementary physics classes.
 
Consider the motion of an electron beam in a cathode-ray tube such as an old-fashioned TV set or oscilloscope. Classical physics is good enough for designing these devices.
 
Or giant racetrack proton accelerators - you need SR, of course, but not QM.
 
So I was right, what we were doing was a (good perhaps) approximation. Thank god, I thought I had misunderstood what QM is!

Now something optional. Can you show me perhaps a way to work with Quantum mechanics in such an exercise, per say? Thanks already, you are a very nice forum! :)
 
Well instead of force, you go to potential and do the shcrödinger equation.

For instance the Coulomb force between electron and proton, go to potential, solve for bound states -> Hydrogen atom.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
528