Is Calculating 69g's as 676.89 m/s² Correct?

Thread starter Oblivion77
Start date Nov 29, 2008
Tags

Acceleration

Join the discussion

Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.

1 reply · 2K views

Oblivion77

Thread starter
Nov 29, 2008

Homework Statement

If I had an acceleration of A=69g's can I just say A=69(9.81) = 676.89m/s^2?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Discussion

Physics news on Phys.org

Ultracold neutrons don't disappear into the mirror world
New research shows how 'hot electrons' can reshape metals in billionths of a second
A way to read quantum bits faster and with less hardware

Ichiro101

Nov 29, 2008

Depends on the context. You are essentially stating the same thing just in different words/numbers. In physics, we would prefer the form (m/s^2) however,.

Is Calculating 69g's as 676.89 m/s² Correct?

Homework Statement

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Discussion

A very simple moments question

Expansion or compression -- which is more energy efficient?

What force causes precession?

Simple kinematics problem — falling from a geostationary satellite

Why does a fan cool you in a sealed room if it adds heat?

Insights Revisiting the Velocity-Time Function

Insights Remote Operated Gate Control System

Insights AI Enriched Problem Solving

Insights Thinking Outside The Box Versus Knowing What’s In The Box

Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect

Is Calculating 69g's as 676.89 m/s² Correct?

Homework Statement

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Discussion

Similar threads