Is Capitalism in Crisis? Watch the Animated Lecture Now!

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter robheus
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the animated lecture addressing the state of capitalism, particularly focusing on claims regarding income stagnation and the influence of different economic theories, such as Marxism and Keynesianism. Participants express their views on the lecture's content and its implications for understanding capitalism.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants challenge the claim that incomes have stagnated or fallen since the 1970s, labeling it as "factually incorrect" and attributing it to a Marxist perspective.
  • One participant critiques the animated lecture for misrepresenting the Austrian economic theory, arguing that it does not support bailouts and emphasizes allowing mismanaged institutions to fail.
  • Another participant highlights a misunderstanding of corporatism, asserting that it differs from capitalism and is tied to government intervention.
  • There is a mention of the ongoing deficit spending as a reflection of Keynesian economic policies, suggesting that this has been a consistent approach in recent years.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretations of economic theories and their implications for capitalism. There is no consensus on the accuracy of the claims made in the lecture or the validity of the economic perspectives discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific economic theories and their implications without resolving the underlying assumptions or definitions of terms such as corporatism and capitalism.

robheus
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Watch this lecture (animated) online:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
And then what
 
I got to the part where he parrot's Chomsky's factually incorrect refrain that incomes have stagnated or fallen since the 1970s and could go no further. Seems like the usual Marxist nonsense to me. Cool animation, though.

Unless you have a point to make/discuss, this thread will be locked.
 
Last edited:
This does not meet our minimum criteria for starting a thread.

Please be sure that you have read the guidelines beofere posting.

In addition to content already prohibited by our global forum guidelines, the following are specifically NOT permitted in Politics & World Affairs:
1) Posts containing only a link or quotes from other sources without any explanation on the part of the person posting them, unless they are in direct response to a request from another member for a source to back up a claim.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=113181
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, as soon as I saw Marxist’s "point of view" I knew where this was going. The commentator got something very wrong.

He stated that the markets has been very symbolic of the Austrian theory (which is an incredible naive stand point- it hasn’t, because the Austrian methodology clearly doesn’t favor bail outs, and stresses that mismanaged private institutions and businesses should be allowed fail ), and then that many academics and economic policy makers should adhere to the Keynesian school (sorry to say that it has been Keynesian... we've been priming the pump... that's what all this deficit spending has been all about).

People don't seem to understand what corporatism is and how it ties to government intervention which leads directly to control. Corporatism is not capitalism.

He's right about the accumulation of capital, but he fails to see that it's the central planners that are also heavily benefiting by their economic policies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
973
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K