Is Gravitational Wave a Projection of Quantum Wave if ER = EPR?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter philton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Epr Gravitational wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conjecture "ER = EPR" and its implications for gravitational waves, specifically whether gravitational waves could be considered a projection of quantum waves. The scope includes theoretical exploration and conceptual clarification related to quantum mechanics and gravitational theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if "ER = EPR" is true, then it might be possible for gravitational waves to be equivalent to a 3+1 dimensional aspect of quantum waves.
  • One participant draws a parallel between the topic and holographic theory, suggesting that information about matter could be encoded on the boundary of a volume, similar to concepts in loop quantum gravity (LQG).
  • There is a mention of the complexity of the "spin network" system in LQG, which tracks differences in geometrical shapes, though the understanding of this concept is acknowledged as basic by the participant.
  • Several posts express confusion regarding the use of a homework template for this discussion, indicating a potential mismatch in the forum's categorization of the topic.
  • One participant references a perceived inconsistency in the work of a prominent physicist, suggesting a lack of logical conclusion in some of his claims, though this is presented as a personal opinion rather than a consensus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varied opinions on the relationship between gravitational waves and quantum waves, with no clear consensus reached. The discussion remains open-ended with multiple viewpoints presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate uncertainty about the implications of the "ER = EPR" conjecture and the relationship between gravitational and quantum waves, highlighting the speculative nature of the discussion.

philton
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If ER==EPR
Then IsPossible(gravitational wave == projection of quantum wave)

In other words:
If the conjecture of "ER = EPR" is true,
is it possible that "gravitational wave = 3+1 dimensional part of quantum wave" is also true?

2. Homework Equations

The quantum source of space-time
http://www.nature.com/news/the-quantum-source-of-space-time-1.18797

Cool horizons for entangled black holes, J. Maldacena, and L. Susskind
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...ionid=95519C344758B59645E88FD8046B8421.f04t02

The Attempt at a Solution


Casual discussion, brain storming
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philton said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Casual discussion, brain storming
Not sure how you wound up with a homework template but interesting topic none the less!
philton said:
is it possible that "gravitational wave = 3+1 dimensional part of quantum wave" is also true?
The first article you linked is similar to holographic theory, how the information of matter in a given volume can be encoded in the "surface" of the boundary. The "spin network" system used in LQG somehow keeps track of differences in sides of NOT identical triangles into pentagrams or tetrahedra or who knows I don't really have much more than a basic concept of it. I'm simply throwing out some examples of theories with some scientific backing which is all that PF rules allows to be discussed, you can get points! for reading the forum rules then you'll know much more of what you can learn here!
 
jerromyjon said:
Not sure how you wound up with a homework template but interesting topic none the less!

I guess this is what Susskind sets as homework o0)
 
jerromyjon said:
Not sure how you wound up with a homework template but interesting topic none the less!
This post was originally in the homework section of the forum, then it was transferred here.
 
atyy said:
I guess this is what Susskind sets as homework o0)
Isn't he the guy that insisted an answer was incorrect even knowing that he himself gave incorrect information? I'm not saying I disagree with him, you fail for your own inability to conclude facts logically, not someone else's.
 
philton said:
This post was originally in the homework section of the forum, then it was transferred here.
So are you still seeking answers or dissatisfied with what you found?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
17K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K