Is it known what dark matter is?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yoni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of dark matter, exploring various hypotheses and models regarding its composition and properties. Participants examine potential candidates for dark matter, including MACHOs and WIMPs, and discuss the implications of these models in the context of astrophysical observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that dark matter could be composed of planets, asteroids, dust, or gas that do not emit enough light, while others argue that dust and gas have been ruled out due to their ability to emit black body radiation.
  • MACHOs (massive compact halo objects) are proposed as a potential form of dark matter, consisting of large bits of rock, black holes, or dead stars that are too cool to detect, although some participants believe they are unlikely to account for all dark matter due to expected lensing effects.
  • WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles) are discussed as another candidate, described as undiscovered particles that could account for dark matter due to their lack of charge and interaction with light.
  • It is noted that dark matter is not made of baryonic matter, which rules out conventional matter like rocks and stars.
  • Participants discuss methods for estimating the density of dark matter by observing distant galaxies and their brightness variations, as well as the use of gravitational lensing to infer the presence of dark matter.
  • Questions arise regarding the interaction of dark matter with charged subatomic particles, with some participants noting that dark matter is thought to interact primarily through gravity and possibly the weak nuclear force.
  • The relationship between dark matter and dark energy is questioned, with a suggestion that conventional models do not link the two concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of dark matter, with no consensus on its exact composition or the validity of different models. Disagreement exists regarding the roles of MACHOs and WIMPs, as well as the implications of gravitational lensing and the interactions of dark matter.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the unresolved status of various hypotheses regarding dark matter candidates and the dependence on observational data that may not fully account for all variables involved.

Yoni
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
Can't it just be planets, asteroids, dust or gas which do not emit enough light to reach us?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No. Dust and gas have been ruled out. (Larger bodies weren't really in the running). Dust and gas will heat up and emit black body radiation. We don't see this.

Whatever it is, it isn't interacting with EM radiation at all.
 
There are MACHOS and WIMPS that are thought to be dark matter, right? However, I forgot what they stand for, or what they are, exactly.
 
MACHOS are massive compact halo objects, large bits of rock, black holes, dead stars that are too cool to detect.
I think they are pretty much ruled out as the source of all the dark matter, if there were enough of them we would see them as lensing effects as they pass in front of distant visible objects.

WIMPS are weakly interacting massive particles, some undiscovered particle like a neutrino that has enough mass to make up the dark matter, but no charge so it doesn't have a detecable effect on light.
 
The only thing known for certain about dark matter is what it is not. Specifically it is NOT made up of baryonic matter (stuff made from neutrons and protons). This rules out rocks, stars, etc.
 
mgb_phys said:
MACHOS are massive compact halo objects, large bits of rock, black holes, dead stars that are too cool to detect.
I think they are pretty much ruled out as the source of all the dark matter, if there were enough of them we would see them as lensing effects as they pass in front of distant visible objects.

doesnt that require knowing the rate at which they are moving across the sky? how is that calculated?
 
I imagine you just observe a large number of distant galaxies and look for short term variations in their brightness. From the rate of transient events you can work out the density of objects in the halo, although probably not anything about the halo object.
 
mgb_phys said:
I imagine you just observe a large number of distant galaxies and look for short term variations in their brightness. From the rate of transient events you can work out the density of objects in the halo, although probably not anything about the halo object.

so you use the rotation curve of the galaxy. that makes sense.
 
So let me get this straight Mathman, Dark Matter doesn't interact at all with any charged subatomic particles? What about Neutrinos?
-no wonder why none of our instruments will detect it.
I sure hope CERN turns something up.

What is the relationship between dark matter and dark energy? despite matter is a form of energy...
 
  • #10
granpa said:
so you use the rotation curve of the galaxy. that makes sense.

Not quite - you use distant background galaxies as a set of randomly distributed point sources.
As the nearby dark object goes in front of a galaxy there will be a lensing effect that will dim/brighten the image of the distant galaxy.
From the amount of lensing you can get an estimate of the mass/size of the invisible object.
 
  • #11
taylaron said:
So let me get this straight Mathman, Dark Matter doesn't interact at all with any charged subatomic particles? What about Neutrinos?
-no wonder why none of our instruments will detect it.
I sure hope CERN turns something up.

The theory of the synthesis of elements in the early universe (big bang nucleosynthesis), and the observation of present relative abundances of elements indicate that, as mathman said, dark matter is not made of protons and neutrons (or other baryons).

Dark matter is thought to interact with normal matter only through gravity (observed) and the weak nuclear force (theoretical). Maybe CERN will turn up some of the particles predicted by supersymmetry, and, if this happens, this will give credence to the idea that supersymmetric stuff makes up dark matter.

Neutrinos do contribute, but their contribution is not that significant.
taylaron said:
What is the relationship between dark matter and dark energy? despite matter is a form of energy...

In conventional models, there is no link between dark matter and dark energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K