Is it possible that "dark matter" is a side effect?

  • Thread starter SCSF
  • Start date
  • #1
2
0
How do we know that the effects of "dark matter" are not merely a failure of some other aspect of general relativity? Could it be that it is not matter at all but instead some placeholder for another aspect of our universe, or is it proven that there must be some form of 'matter', so to speak? If so, what is this proof?

I understand that there is some forms of radiation which we predict results from dark matter interactions, and I admit I don't have full understanding of this topic, but I am curious as to why dark 'matter' is a popular theory, and not some other explanation for the discrepancies we observe.

Thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,974
2,463
Google 'Bullet Cluster'.

The implications should convince you that DM is most likely a real phenom of some sort of particle. While not definitive, it all but rules out 'tweaks to gravity' theories.
 
  • #3
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,829
6,650
Theories with modified gravity have been considered by the scientific community for quite some time. At the moment, they simply do not fit observations as well as the dark matter hypothesis.
 

Related Threads on Is it possible that "dark matter" is a side effect?

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
4
Replies
76
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
927
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top