Is $\mathbb{R}^J$ in the product topology metrizable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that the space $\mathbb{R}^J$ with an uncountable index set $J$ in the product topology is not metrizable. Opalg provided a definitive solution demonstrating that the product topology on $\mathbb{R}^J$ fails to satisfy the conditions necessary for metrizability due to the uncountability of the index set. Key concepts such as the Tychonoff theorem and the properties of product spaces were utilized in the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of product topology and its properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of metrizability in topological spaces
  • Knowledge of Tychonoff's theorem
  • Basic concepts of set theory, particularly regarding index sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Tychonoff's theorem in detail
  • Explore examples of metrizable spaces and their properties
  • Investigate the implications of uncountable index sets in topology
  • Learn about alternative topologies on $\mathbb{R}^J$ and their metrizability
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology, graduate students studying advanced topology concepts, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of product spaces and metrizability.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem.

-----

Problem: Let $J$ be an uncountable index set. Prove that $\mathbb{R}^J$ in the product topology is not metrizable.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly answered by Opalg. You can find his solution below.

Claim 1. If $X$ is a metric space and $E\subset X$, then every element $x$ in the closure of $E$ is the limit of a sequence in $E$.

Proof. For $n=1,2,\ldots$, the ball of radius $1/n$ centred at $x$ has nonempty intersection with $E$. Let $x_n$ be an element in that intersection. Then $x_n\to x.$Now define a subset $E\subset \mathbb{R}^J$ as follows. Denote by $\mathcal{F}$ the set of all finite subsets of $J$. For each $F\in\mathcal{F}$ define $x_F\in \mathbb{R}^J$ by $(x_F)_j = \begin{cases}0& (j\in F), \\ 1& (j\notin F). \end{cases}$
So $E$ is the set of all elements of $\mathbb{R}^J$ whose coordinates are all $1$ except for a finite number that can be $0$. Denote by $\mathbf{0}$ the element of $\mathbb{R}^J$ whose coordinates are all zero.Claim 2. The closure of $E$ contains $\mathbf{0}$.

Proof. It will be sufficient to show that every basic neighbourhood of $\mathbf{0}$ (for the product topology) has nonempty intersection with $E$. A basic neighbourhood $U$ of $\mathbf{0}$ has the following form. First, take $F\in \mathcal{F}$. Next, for each $j\in F$, let $U_j$ be a neighbourhood of $0\in\mathbb{R}$. Then $U = \{x = (x_j)_{j\in J} \in \mathbb{R}^J : x_j\in U_j\;(\forall j\in F)\}.$ Given such a neighbourhood, clearly, $x_F \in U\cap E.$ So $U\cap E$ is nonempty, as required.Claim 3. There is no sequence in $E$ that converges to $\mathbf{0}$.

Proof. Let $\bigl(x_{F_n}\bigr)_{n\geqslant1}$ be a sequence in $E$. Then $$F = \bigcup_{n\geqslant1}F_n$$ is a countable union of finite subsets of $J$ and is therefore countable. Since $J$ is uncountable, there exists an element of $J_0\in J$ that is not in $F$ and therefore not in any of the sets $F_n.$ The set $\{x\in \mathbb{R}^J : x_{j_0} <1\}$ is a neighbourhood of $\mathbf{0}$ that does not contain any of the points $x_{F_n}$ (because they all have $j_0$-coordinate equal to $1$). Therefore the sequence $(x_{F_n})$ cannot converge to $\mathbf{0}$ in the product topology.The three Claims together show that the product topology on $\mathbb{R}^J$ is not metrisable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K