Is my solution for a differential equation with a forcing function correct?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zoom1
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 4K views
zoom1
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Have an equation;

d2y(t)/dt2 + 5d2y(t)/dt2 + 4y(t) = 2e-2t

Solved the complementary(homogenous) part and the function and got the roots of -1 and -4

so the yh(t) is A1.e-4t + A2.e-t

Forcing function is 2.e-2t so yparticular(t) is A.e-2t

Am I right here ? Or am I supposed to use Ate-2t

Well, if I use the first one, the resultant function doesn't give me the 2.e-2t when I put it into the differential equation, so there is something wrong obviously.

However F(t) or one of its derivatives are not identical to terms in the homogenous solution, so I think I have to use the first option, which is A.e-2t

After proceeding I ended up with yp(t) = 1/3.e-2t

Initial values are y(0) = 0 and y(1)(0) = 0

so, K1 = -1/9 and K2 = -2/9

Still couldn't find where I am wrong
Appreciate if you help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zoom1 said:
Have an equation;

d2y(t)/dt2 + 5d2y(t)/dt2 + 4y(t) = 2e-2t

Solved the complementary(homogenous) part and the function and got the roots of -1 and -4

For the differential equation you posted, the above roots are not correct. Did you intend for there to be two second order terms in the equation when you posted it?
 
gulfcoastfella said:
For the differential equation you posted, the above roots are not correct. Did you intend for there to be two second order terms in the equation when you posted it?

Ohh, pardon me, the second term is not the second derivative, it had to be first derivative.
 
Office_Shredder said:
You should double check your calculation for Ae-2t

Got it! Thank you ;)
 
I got a particular solution of y[itex]_{p}[/itex] = -e[itex]^{-2t}[/itex]. See if you get the same.
 
I get [itex]A_1=\frac{1}{3}[/itex] and [itex]A_2=\frac{3}{2}[/itex]. The particular solution given above is correct.

Double-check your calculations.