Is Oxygen More Abundant Than Carbon in the Universe Due to Nuclear Fusion?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iced199
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxygen
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relative abundance of oxygen and carbon in the universe, particularly in the context of nuclear fusion processes in stars. Participants explore the mechanisms of nucleosynthesis and the factors influencing the production of these elements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that four hydrogen atoms fuse to form one helium atom, and subsequently, three helium atoms combine to create one carbon atom, questioning why oxygen is more abundant than carbon despite this process.
  • Another participant suggests that carbon may be synthesized into oxygen, implying that the initial production of carbon could lead to a greater abundance of oxygen.
  • A participant explains that the nuclear reactions involved in fusion are complex, highlighting that while helium converts to carbon relatively easily, the transition from carbon to oxygen is also straightforward, leading to a greater accumulation of oxygen.
  • Discussion includes the concept of nuclear spectral lines, which can significantly influence reaction rates in nucleosynthesis, with one participant detailing how these lines affect the fusion processes.
  • Another participant elaborates on the resonance phenomenon in nuclear reactions, indicating that certain energy levels in nuclei can enhance reaction rates, particularly in the formation of carbon from helium.
  • One participant mentions the role of the 8Be nucleus and its energy in increasing reaction rates, contributing to the overall discussion of nucleosynthesis dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses regarding the abundance of oxygen versus carbon, with no consensus reached on the definitive reasons behind the observed abundances. Multiple competing views and explanations remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves complex nuclear physics concepts, including the role of nuclear spectral lines and resonance in fusion processes. Some assumptions and dependencies on specific definitions are present but not fully articulated.

iced199
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
From my rather weak understanding of nuclear fusion in stars, four hydrogen atoms are combined into one helium atom. Then, three helium atoms are combined into one carbon atom. What I don't understand is why there is more oxygen in the universe (from the wikipedia article) than carbon, if carbon is produced first in the fusion process. Why is there more oxygen?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Have you considered that some of the carbon gets synthesized into oxygen?
i.e. there is more oxygen than carbon because the carbon gets made first?
 
It turns out that the reactions are

helium -> carbon (a little difficult)
carbon -> oxygen (not too hard)
oxygen -> neon (really, really hard)

So what ends up happening is that more of the stuff "bunches" up in oxygen

A lot of this depends on some detailed physics. There just happens to be a nuclear spectral line that makes it not too difficult to go from helium to carbon, and there also happens to be a spectral line that blocks the conversion from oxygen to neon.

Fred Hoyle, who discovered this, believed that this was too much to be conincidence and he took this as evidence of God. On the other hand, he also believed that life couldn't have started on earth, and he also was a very strong opponent of the big bang.
 
What exactly is a "Nuclear Spectral Line" twofish? And how does it apply to the nuclear reactions in nucleosynthesis?
 
Drakkith said:
What exactly is a "Nuclear Spectral Line" twofish? And how does it apply to the nuclear reactions in nucleosynthesis?

Here is one of thinking about it.

You have an atom with electrons at different energy levels. If that atom happens to hit a photon at the exact frequency as the energy level, the atom is much more likely to absorb the photon, and you get a spectral line. Change the photon so that it is a slightly different energy then it misses the energy level and it's not absorbed.

The same thing happens with nuclei. Nuclei have different energy levels. If you throw one nuclei at another and there happens to be an energy level at exactly that energy, then the reaction rate increases a lot. This is critical for the 2 He4 -> Be8 + He4 -> C12 reaction. If you calculate the "ordinary" reaction rate, it's quite low, and it wouldn't happen. However C12 happens to have a spectral line at exactly the right energy to make the Be8 + He4 go much, much faster than it ordinarily would. The math of nuclei absorbing helium nuclei is exactly the same as atoms absorbing photons. It's also called a resonance.

This is one reason that people sort of take the anthropic principle seriously. Fred Hoyle was able to deduce that C12 *must* have an spectral line at the energy that speeds up the Be8 + He4 reaction.

Now it turns out that the reaction O16 + He4 -> Ne20 is something that you'd normally expect to happen at a high rate, which would be bad because that would mean that you wouldn't get a build up of O16 and C12. But there is some nuclear thing (I think it has to do with spin) that just happens to work out to block that reaction.
 
Ah ok, that makes sense. Thanks.
 
It is not just the carbon atom: The 8Be nucleus has approximately the energy of 2 alpha-particles, which increases this reaction rate, too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K