Is the Matrix Representation of a Unitary Operator Always a Unitary Matrix?

[facenian]

I have a very basic question. I'm confused because I've read in a text that the matrix representation of a unitary operator is a unitary matrix if the basis is orthogonal, however I believe that the matrix is unitary whatever basis one uses. I'd appretiate any comments on this.

 

[malawi_glenn]

which text?

 

[facenian]

which text?

Quantum Mechanics(third edition) E. Merzbacher-Chapter 17 Page 418,I quote :"Since the operators U_a were assumed to be unitary, the representation matrices are also unitary if the basis is orthonormal"

 

[George Jones]

Try a simple example. Take the identity matrix on a 2-dimensional space, which is clearly unitary. Use linearity to compute the matrix elements with respect to the basis e_{1}' = e_1 and e_{2}' = e_1 + e_2, where e_1 and e_1 make up an orthonormal basis.

Does this give a unitary matrix?

 

[Fredrik]

A unitary matrix U satisfies \sum_j U^*_{ji}U_{jk}=\delta_{ik}. Is this satisfied by the matrix representation of a unitary operator?

\sum_j U^*_{ji}U_{jk}=\sum_j\langle j|U|i\rangle^*\langle j|U|k\rangle=\sum_j\langle i|U^\dagger|j\rangle\langle j|U|k\rangle=\langle i|U^\dagger\Big(\sum_j|j\rangle\langle j|\Big)U|k\rangle

This reduces to \delta_{ij} if the parenthesis is the identity operator. I can prove that it is, if I use that the basis is orthonormal, but not without that assumption. So it looks like your book is right. What makes you think it's wrong?

 

[facenian]

thank you people. The orgin of my mistake goes like this : Let T be a untiary operator and |a_i> (i=1,...n) a basis then the matrix elements satisfy,
<a_i|T|a_k>=<a_k|T^{\dag}|a_i>*=<a_k|T^{-1}|a_i>*
what a did not realize was that the matriz elementes in the basis |a_i> are <a_i|T|a_k> only if the basis is orthonomal.

 

[Fredrik]

Oops, I didn't realize that myself.