Is the set of infinite binary sequences countable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set of all infinite binary sequences is proven to be uncountable using Cantor's diagonal argument. The proof demonstrates that for any enumeration of infinite binary sequences, a new sequence can be constructed that differs from each enumerated sequence at least at one position. This construction shows that no one-to-one correspondence can exist between the infinite binary sequences and the natural numbers, confirming their uncountability. The discussion highlights contributions from users Ackbach, Deveno, and magneto, with magneto providing the detailed proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cantor's diagonal argument
  • Familiarity with infinite sequences and binary digits
  • Basic knowledge of set theory and countability
  • Ability to follow mathematical proofs and notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Cantor's diagonal argument in depth
  • Explore the concept of countable vs. uncountable sets
  • Learn about other proofs of uncountability, such as the uncountability of the real numbers
  • Investigate applications of set theory in mathematical logic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students of mathematics interested in set theory, particularly those studying concepts of countability and infinite sequences.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem
: Show that the set of all infinite sequences with entries from $\{0,1\}$ is not countable.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly answered by Ackbach, Deveno, and magneto. You can find magneto's solution below.

[sp]Proof by Cantor's diagonal argument. Let us consider a sequence of infinite binary sequence, $(s_i)_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$:
\begin{align*}
s_1 &= d_{11} d_{12} d_{13} \cdots \\
s_2 &= d_{21} d_{22} d_{23} \cdots \\
&\vdots \\
s_i &= d_{i1} d_{i2} d_{i3} \cdots
\end{align*}

$d_{ij}$ is either 0 or 1 and denotes the $j$-th character of the $i$-th sequence.
Define $s := d_1 d_2 d_3 \cdots$ where $d_k := 1 - d_{kk}$. (I.e., if $d_{kk} = 1$,
$d_k = 0$, otherwise $d_k = 1$.) Note that $s$ is different from all the $s_i$'s at the
$i$-th position by design. There does not exist an integer $t$ where $s = s_t$.
So, we cannot establish a 1-to-1 correspondence from
the infinite sequence of binary digits to $\mathbb{N}$ (since we can find some $s$ that is not
part of the original enumeration), hence the set is uncountable.[/sp]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K