Is there a general method for solving advection-diffusion equations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jmk9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Method
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the advection-diffusion equation with variable coefficients, specifically examining the existence of a general solution and the methods available for tackling such problems. The focus includes both theoretical aspects and potential solutions derived through Fourier transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proposed solution for the advection-diffusion equation using Fourier transforms, expressing uncertainty about its correctness when coefficients are variable.
  • Another participant questions the validity of the proposed solution and seeks clarification on the derivation process, particularly regarding the treatment of variable coefficients.
  • A participant mentions the need for convolution products when dealing with variable coefficients in the Fourier transform context, suggesting that the approach may not hold without these considerations.
  • Further clarification is provided by referencing a previous thread where a similar solution was discussed, indicating a lack of consensus on the general applicability of the proposed method.
  • There is curiosity about whether a general method exists for solving the advection-diffusion equation when the coefficients are continuous and well-behaved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the proposed solution and whether a general method exists for the variable coefficient case. Multiple competing views remain regarding the treatment of the coefficients and the validity of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the proposed solution may be valid under certain conditions, such as when coefficients are constant or only functions of time, but there is no consensus on its applicability to the general case with variable coefficients.

jmk9
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve a transport problem which in its most general form is a diffusion-advection equation with variable coefficients:

<br /> <br /> <br /> \frac{\partial f(x,t)}{\partial t}=a(x,t)\frac{\partial^2 f(x,t)}{\partial x^2}+b(x,t)\frac{\partial f(x,t)}{\partial x}+c(x,t)f(x,t)<br /> <br /> <br />


I am wondering what methods are available for solving such a problem and whether a general solution exists. I have described in another thread the derivation of what appears to be a general solution when we use an initial condition of

<br /> <br /> <br /> f(x,0)=\alpha\delta(x)<br /> <br /> <br />

by manipulating the equation in "Fourier space" I arrive at a solution of the form

<br /> <br /> <br /> f(x,t)=\frac{\alpha e^{-\frac {(x+B(x,t))^{2}} {4A(x,t)} +C(x,t)}}{\sqrt{4\pi A(x,t)}}<br /> <br /> <br />

where

<br /> <br /> <br /> A(x,t)=\int_{0}^{t}a(x,\tau)d\tau<br /> <br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> <br /> B(x,t)=\int_{0}^{t}b(x,\tau)d\tau<br /> <br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> <br /> C(x,t)=\int_{0}^{t}c(x,\tau)d\tau<br /> <br /> <br />


Is this correct? I have a feeling that it is incorrect as I have not found something similar in the literature for the case when a, b and c are functions of x and t. This solution would be correct if they where constants, but I am uncertain about the variable coefficient case.

I really really need help with this one, it's been bothering me for many weeks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone comment if this solution is correct? I have a feeling it is not but I need to know why!

thanks in advance
 
I have described in another thread the derivation of what appears to be a general solution...
In what thread ?
In order to express the Fourier transform of the PDE, one need to express the Fourier transforms of a(x,t)d²f(x,t)/dx², of b(x,t)df(x,t)/dx and of c(x,t)f(x,t)
I cannot see how you do that and find the relationship with the F(w,t) without the respective convolution products with the Fourier transforms of a(x,t), b(x,t) and c(x,t).
Of course, not problem if a, b, c are not functions of x.
 
Thank you for the reply, greatly appreciated. The other thread I am referring to is

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=492001"

What I have done is substitute only

<br /> <br /> <br /> f(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int e^{ikx}\tilde{f}(k,t)dk<br /> <br /> <br />

and then proceed from there; the method seemed coherent but I am not sure about it as I haven't encountered this formula in any handbooks or textbooks that I have looked (unless of course a, b and c are constant in which case it is correct).

It is good to know that this is a solution in the case where a, b and c are functions of t only. But I am also curious to know whether a general method exists for solving such equations given that a, b and c are continuous and generally "well behaved".
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K