Is there a perfect solution to the trolley problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the trolley problem and its implications for autonomous vehicles. Participants express skepticism about finding a perfect solution within the problem's parameters, emphasizing that the scenario often feels contrived. The conversation highlights the complexities of accountability in accidents involving AI, contrasting it with the clear accountability of human drivers. There is a consensus that simply braking can often prevent the need for such ethical dilemmas, and it is noted that human drivers tend to act selfishly in emergencies, prioritizing their passengers' safety over others. The dialogue suggests that societal attitudes toward these issues may evolve over time as autonomous technology becomes more commonplace.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,998
Reaction score
8,143
I've never seen a perfect solution to the trolley problem that lives entirely within the given parameters of the problem (i.e. does not introduce any components or actions that are not explicitly stated in the problem).



:bow:
 
  • Wow
  • Informative
Likes Frabjous and collinsmark
Physics news on Phys.org
If only all thorny problems like this were so easily sidestepped, @DaveC426913 🤦‍♂️

More seriously, I find the trolley problem genuinely interesting as applied to autonomous vehicles because the context ultimately seems to fall back to a cynical, "Who are we going to sue?" It is easy to hold a human driver accountable. Some disembodied machine intelligence? Not so much!
 
Melbourne Guy said:
More seriously, I find the trolley problem genuinely interesting as applied to autonomous vehicles because the context ultimately seems to fall back to a cynical, "Who are we going to sue?"
This has been batted around a lot.

I'd say the general consensus is it's a pretty contrived scenario where an AI is forced to choose. Simply braking mitigates almost all realistic scenarios.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I'd say the general consensus is it's a pretty contrived scenario where an AI is forced to choose. Simply braking mitigates almost all realistic scenarios.
Absolutely, @DaveC426913, and a lot of the AI-oriented ethical outrage fails to acknowledge that human drivers are generally selfish when it comes to accidents. We'll instinctually swerve away from another vehicle, putting our passengers in the line of fire. We'll work our way through this stage of resistance / adoption and at some point the young 'uns will look back and wonder at what all the fuss was about.
 
To some degree, this thread is inspired by PF user erobz's thread "Why do we spend so much time learning grammar in the public school system?" That's why I made a title to this thread that paralleled the title of erobz's thread. I totally disagree with erobz. I created this thread because the curriculum of grammar at Universities is a totally distinct topic from the topic of the curriculum of grammar in public schools. I have noticed that the English grammar of many ( perhaps most)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
403
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
341
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K