I Is this correct? Casimir Effect

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter raracon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Casimir effect
raracon
Messages
35
Reaction score
14
TL;DR Summary
Quick fact check
"In the example of Fig. 1, Maxwell’s equations allow field modes of arbitrarily large frequency both between the plates and outside them, and therefore the zero-point field energy is infinite when the plates are separated by a finite distance d as well as when they are infinitely far apart. However, the difference in zero-point energy for the two cases is finite, and its dependence on the plate separation d implies a force F = −πhc/480d^4 per unit area."

Fig 1:
CASE.png


Read this in a book about the Casimir Effect. Now my question is if it is correct to say that between the two perfectly conducting plates there can be modes with any frequency? I've read in other books that the frequency is limited by the separation between the plates.

And my other question is how does one explain F = −πhc/480d^4 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Wiki article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect shows formula, the excitation is quantized by plane boundary condition so lower vacuum energy than outside take place between the plates. The formula of F is also derived there.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top