Is time travel to the future easier than the past?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of time travel to the future versus the past, emphasizing that time travel to the past is not possible due to the immense energy required to reverse the state of all particles on Earth. In contrast, time travel to the future is theoretically achievable by maintaining a fixed position while manipulating time and space, although current technology does not allow for significant advancements in this area. The conversation highlights the concept of relativistic time dilation, where traveling at a substantial fraction of the speed of light could enable future time travel, but this remains a distant possibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the theory of relativity
  • Knowledge of time dilation effects
  • Basic concepts of particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity on time travel
  • Explore quantum mechanics and its relation to time manipulation
  • Investigate current advancements in high-speed space travel technologies
  • Study the grandfather paradox and its resolutions in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, quantum mechanics students, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of time travel and its implications in modern science.

Genecks
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
So, I've been learning about quantum mechanics as of late.

If I understand correctly, there would be a large amount of energy required to "turn back the clock" on all particles throughout Earth (assume that I don't change the position of satellites or the stars) in order to go back in time.

However, if I time travel into the future, all I have to do is maintain a somewhat fixed position on Earth while bending or passing time and space around me until I get ahead into the point in future that I want. Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Genecks said:
So, I've been learning about quantum mechanics as of late.

If I understand correctly, there would be a large amount of energy required to "turn back the clock" on all particles throughout Earth (assume that I don't change the position of satellites or the stars) in order to go back in time.

However, if I time travel into the future, all I have to do is maintain a somewhat fixed position on Earth while bending or passing time and space around me until I get ahead into the point in future that I want. Is that right?

Time travel into the past is not possible at all. Time travel into the future is possible at the rate of one second per second ... as you are doing right now.

You can "jump ahead" into the future of a given location by traveling away from it and back again at a substantial portion of the speed of light, a feat that is not now possible with our technology and will not likely BE possible (in any way meaningful for human travel) for centuries.
 
I don't see that. However, I think I'll take this thread to another board here at PF.

Where should I go to talk about time travel on PF?

In able to go to the future, why can't time and space simply bend around me while I attempt to maintain a particular position on Earth? The way I see it, if I did bend time and space around me, unfortunately, I could end up in outer space while the Earth is still rotating around the sun or perhaps end up in the Atlantic ocean or something.

I guess from my viewpoint, then, I'd want to be in outer space to make sure my time machine doesn't end up in the ocean or some obscure place. Also, I think I've found a way out of the grandfather paradox.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but this thread does not meet forum rules. Please read our rules on overly speculative posts and personal theories, then if you have a specific question that meets our guidelines, you may post in the appropriate forum, based on your question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K