Is U+W the Same as U∪W in Vector Spaces?

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter athrun200
  • Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum Union
4 replies · 2K views · last reply
athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Typed text comparing U+W and U∪W with U = {0,1} and W = {1,2}, concluding U+W = U∪W = {0,1,2}, plus a question asking which operation gives a larger set.
 
Attachments
  • Typed text comparing U+W and U∪W with U = {0,1} and W = {1,2}, giving U+W = U∪W = {0,1,2}, followed by a question about which operation produces a larger set.
    1.gif
    2 KB · Views: 607
I know what [itex]U \cup W[/itex] is, but how is [itex]U + W[/itex] defined?
 
I don't know, but I saw it from books
 
Attachments
  • Printed textbook excerpt: Theorem 5.2.2 states that if U and W are subspaces of a vector space V, then U ∩ W and U + W are subspaces of V. The proof begins: Let us first consider the intersection of subspaces. Assume that U and W are nontrivial subspaces and that v1 and v2 are in the
    1.JPG
    19.4 KB · Views: 507
There many different meanings for mathematical notations, depending on the context. The page you gave is not talking about "+" in the context of sets. (In the context of sets, some books use [itex]A + B[/itex] to denote [itex](A \cup B) - (A \cap B)[/itex].)

The page is talking about vector spaces. In that contex, I think [itex]U + W[/itex] means the vector space consisting of all vectors [itex]h[/itex] that can be expressed as [itex]h = u + w[/itex] where [itex]u \in U[/itex] and [itex]w \in W[/itex].

However, if you want to be sure of the meaning of "+" in a particular book, you must see what that book says it means. There is no "universal" meaning for it.
 
for vector spaces, particularly when U,W are subspaces of a vector space V,

U+W is a subspace of V, U∪W usually is not.