Is $\underline{k} = \langle 0,0,1 \rangle$ by Definition in Vector Notation?

Context:
Thread starter Joe20
Start date Mar 19, 2018

Join the discussion

Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.

Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips

1 reply · 8K views

Joe20

Thread starter
Mar 19, 2018

Not sure how I should do this question. I have attached my workings with some questions in it. appreciate the help.

View attachment 7978

View attachment 7977

Last edited by a moderator: Mar 19, 2018

Physics news on Phys.org

Materials surrounding a fusion reaction can dramatically increase how often it occurs
Chocolate syrup-like fluid stores multiple interacting memories
Engineers observe quantum heat waves at room temperature

tkhunny

Mar 20, 2018

Isn't $\underline{k} = \langle 0,0,1 \rangle$, by definition?

Is $\underline{k} = \langle 0,0,1 \rangle$ by Definition in Vector Notation?

Attachments

Undergrad The vector to which a dual vector corresponds

Undergrad Spinor calculus

Undergrad Matrix representation of rank-2 spinors

Undergrad Looking for a paper about spinors

Undergrad Why are these cycles disjoint and of equal length?

On the Moore–Penrose inverse from a banal linear algebra viewpoint

Insights Revisiting the Velocity-Time Function

Insights Remote Operated Gate Control System

Insights AI Enriched Problem Solving

Insights Thinking Outside The Box Versus Knowing What’s In The Box

Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect

Is $\underline{k} = \langle 0,0,1 \rangle$ by Definition in Vector Notation?

Attachments

Similar threads