Is unemployment necessary for a functioning economy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasse
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of unemployment for a functioning economy, exploring various perspectives on the relationship between labor availability, economic health, and the implications of different unemployment rates. Participants examine the causes of unemployment, its effects on wages and inflation, and the role of funding in employment opportunities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that there is a significant amount of work to be done in society, yet millions remain unemployed, questioning the reasons behind this disparity.
  • One participant challenges the notion that there is a lack of work, suggesting that the availability of funds to pay for labor is a more pressing issue, particularly in wealthier versus poorer neighborhoods.
  • Another viewpoint presented is that labor operates under supply and demand principles, indicating that unemployment is a natural outcome of market dynamics.
  • It is noted that achieving 0% unemployment is unrealistic due to factors such as voluntary unemployment, mismatches in job skills, and financial constraints faced by employers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the causes and implications of unemployment, with no consensus reached on whether unemployment is necessary for a functioning economy or how it should be addressed.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments depend on assumptions about the availability of work and funding, as well as the definitions of unemployment and labor market dynamics. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
Wherever we are and wherever we look, there is work to be done, work for our subsistence and well-being, for food, shelter, clothing and countless other wants, to build and create, or just to clean and maintain. Labor, though, is scarcer by tar than tools and equipment. Just visit a workshop, factory, office or construction site. There, expensive equipment is used for a few minutes of hours only, standing idle most of the time. Or just walk through the streets of most cities; they cry out for labor to clean and maintain, to repair and rebuild.

Yet millions of workers in the industrial countries are unemployed. Some seven to eight million Americans always are normally unemployed, many more during periods of stagnation and decline.

Why is this? Is it because of government regulation? Is a certain degree of unemployment healthy for the economy, after all? Is it true that 0% unemployment would allow the workers to push their wages up, thereby creating inflation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kasse said:
Wherever we are and wherever we look, there is work to be done, work for our subsistence and well-being, for food, shelter, clothing and countless other wants, to build and create, or just to clean and maintain.

Do you see piles of money lying around to pay for this work while you're looking?

Just visit a workshop, factory, office or construction site. There, expensive equipment is used for a few minutes of hours only, standing idle most of the time.

You should visit more workshops, factories and construction sites then. This statement is wrong.

Or just walk through the streets of most cities; they cry out for labor to clean and maintain, to repair and rebuild.

DC is nice, clean and well maintained to me.

Why is this? Is it because of government regulation? Is a certain degree of unemployment healthy for the economy, after all? Is it true that 0% unemployment would allow the workers to push their wages up, thereby creating inflation?

Prehaps you should look online for a government study that looks into answering this question. It will give you more insight than speculative posts.
 
I don't think unemployment is so much an issue of lack of work that could be done but lack of funds to pay for the work to be done. If you go to a rich neighbourhood they will likely have rather clean streets and few unemployed people. Go to a poorer neighbourhood and you will likely find dirtier streets and more unemployed people.
 
Labor is a market like any other and as such it is subject to the rules of supply and demand. Unemployment is a natural consequence of that.
 
You cannot have 0% unemployment.
- Some people are voluntary unemployed. (Not a concern)
- Some people don't find right jobs .
- Companies fail to get people who have the right skills. (big concern)
- Some employers simply don't have enough money to pay workers (not a big concern)
 

Similar threads

News Does Rick perry have a plan to fix the US economy?
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
What is the true impact of free trade agreements on the American economy?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
News Obama Inaugural Address: Summary & Analysis
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K