Is Violence Ever Justified, and What Causes It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moridin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the justification of violence in response to violence, exploring complex philosophical and ethical considerations. Participants argue that while self-defense may warrant violence, it is often seen as a failure and a last resort. The conversation highlights the importance of context, suggesting that if violence can be resolved through nonviolent means, it should be pursued. However, in situations where individuals lack access to authorities or face oppression, violence might be deemed necessary for liberation. The dialogue also questions the nature of justice, suggesting that violence can perpetuate cycles of conflict and that true peace cannot arise from justified violence. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need to understand the root causes of violence and the human condition, advocating for love and understanding as stronger forces than violence.
Moridin
Messages
692
Reaction score
3
Do you think that violence is justified in order to stop violence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is not about violence, but about the meaning of justification
 
Moridin said:
Do you think that violence is justified in order to stop violence?

yes, it is
 
I don't care if it is justified or not, if someone comes at me or mine with the intent of bodily harm I will do whatever it takes to defend myself. However, I do share the sentiment of Isaac Asimov who said, "Violence is the last resort of the incompetent". If I do have to resort to violence I feel it is a failing on my part.
 
justifications is a reason for action. If violence comes without a reason which is not violence, maybe violence is justified in order to stop it.

If the reason is violence, maybe all violence is justified or all not.
Otherwise if the problem which causes the violence can be solved nonviolently, why not to stop violence by solving the problem. If the problem can only be solved by violence, why do you resort to violence stop violence?
 
Last edited:
There are three answers (solutions) to this problem.It is justified relative to the person who has been hurt by the initial violent act, but it is not justified to the person who initially caused the violence as that person would in no way would want to receive back violence. In a conscious frame of reference apart from man, it is neither justified nor unjustified, it does not exist!
 
I think sometimes violence is even justified against non-violence (depending on how you define violence).

If you don't have access to authorities and you're being imprisoned, blackmailed, or somehow oppressed by somebody, violence may be the best action to secure your freedom.

Again, it depends on your definition of violent.

If we go with the standard:

acting with or marked by or resulting from great force or energy or emotional intensity; "a violent attack"; "a violent person"; "violent feelings"; "a violent rage"; "felt a violent dislike"

then somebody could poison you to death without being violent. Somebody could also hold you against your will without being violent. Violence may be the only way out for you.

So in my opinion, violence itself isn't bad, it's how it's used, just like anything else.
 
Delete Succusion

When is justice violent? What justifies violence? What is violent justice? What justifies justice? Justice without violence reveals violence without justice, but justice with violence is a violent justice and a justified violence, and if that is so then when will violence stop? It most certainly wouldn't be the result of the bolded formerly defined just cause. For violence to stop, just must be only of a peacefull act in the mind of the Human Being. If one desires peace then one can not justify violence, for violence justified is not a peace at all, and to justify violence for thy own enemy is to create more of a war/attack that is already in place.

What is just about violence? Are we speaking of the currently rotted Human morality or of existential/universal cause and effect, that which are eternally perpetuated? The act(s) of bartered violence will only reciprocate and is only a reciprocation, and a weak one at that. Violence in a limited and enclosed system is weak and will eventually self destruct, love is strong, love is eternal.

Opinions are freely entitled and allowed as is alacrity and sumnolency, yet the consequences of and from actions and effects are a conscious one's endless prison or paradise rendered of personal choice by means of the macro environment and its decisions simultaneously through and of both the precedently mentioned.
 
Last edited:
In an atmosphere of violence to defend onself is justified. What is more important to consider is why this atmosphere of violence has come about. What is it that turns a particular country, race, group into an enemy. Violence on a large scale as in a war only leads to further anger and hatred and oppression. Why is it that mankind despite being so "intellegent" is a slave to anger, the answer lies in understanding one-self.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
77
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top