Isotope word question clarification

  • Thread starter Thread starter opus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotope
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around a multiple-choice question regarding the atomic mass of isotopes and how it relates to the sum of the masses of protons and neutrons. Participants explore the implications of binding energy and mass loss in the context of isotopes, with a focus on understanding the nuances of the question posed.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant selected option D, suggesting that isotopes can have atomic masses that are greater than, less than, or equal to the sum of the masses of protons and neutrons, depending on the number of neutrons present.
  • Another participant explained that the atomic mass can be estimated by summing the masses of protons and neutrons, noting that the mass of the atom is slightly less due to binding energy, which results in a loss of mass when particles come together.
  • A different participant questioned how the mass of nucleons could be anything but the sum of their masses when they are inside the isotope, indicating confusion about the application of mass loss in this context.
  • One participant clarified that the mass of the atom is less than the sum of the masses of the individual nucleons, attributing this to the energy released during the formation of the atom, as described by the equation E=mc².
  • Another participant expressed a limited understanding of the concept of nuclear fusion and its relevance to the question, while also expressing dissatisfaction with the clarity of the question itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit varying levels of understanding regarding the relationship between atomic mass and the sum of nucleon masses, with some confusion about the implications of binding energy and mass loss. There is no consensus on the clarity of the question or the correct answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of precise wording in the question, particularly regarding how the masses of protons and neutrons are determined in relation to their state within the isotope.

opus
Gold Member
Messages
717
Reaction score
131

Homework Statement


This is a multiple choice question. I have uploaded a screenshot of the question for reference.

The atomic mass for a particular isotope of an element will:

a) Always be equal to the value obtained by summing the masses of the protons and neutrons present in the atom.

b) Always be less than the masses obtained by summing the masses of the protons and neutrons present in the isotope.

c) Always be greater than the masses obtained by summing the masses of the protons and neutrons present in that isotope.

d) May be the same as, greater than, or less than the masses obtained by summing the masses of the protons and neutrons present in that isotope.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Maybe I don't fully understand the question, but I chose my D because isotopes can have greater masses or lesser masses compared to the atom they're an isotope of. For example, if Carbon loses neutrons, its mass will be less than the vanilla Carbon atom. If Carbon gains neutrons, its mass will be greater than the vanilla Carbon atom. I guess I don't full understand the scope of the question.
Would anyone mind giving me some guidance?https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/231121 https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/231121 https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/231121
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-09-24 at 8.17.04 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-09-24 at 8.17.04 PM.png
    13 KB · Views: 433
Physics news on Phys.org
To a good approximation, the atomic mass of an atom (which includes any isotope of that atom) can be estimated by taking the mass of a proton and multiplying by the number of protons, and adding to this the mass of a neutron multiplied by the number of neutrons. Or similarly, just count the number of protons and neutrons and multiply by ## 1.67 \cdot 10^{-27} \, kg ##, because the mass of the proton and neutron are quite similar. ## \\ ## Because the particles (protons and neutrons) in the atom are in a state of lower energy than they are as free particles, the mass of the atom experiences a loss of mass (it's not a large amount, but it's not zero), as the particles come together to form an atom. ## \\ ## Edit: The atomic mass of the carbon 12 atom is defined as 12. Thereby, depending on what kind of binding energy the atom has, the individual particles in an atom could on average have more or less binding energy than they do in the ## C^{12} ## atom. (According to the answer that was provided, the question is referring to how the masses were determined in the second paragraph, and the info of ## C^{12} ## is actually extraneous ).## \\ ## With this info, you should be able to select the correct answer. ## \\ ## See also: https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Compositions/stand_alone.pl
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: opus
Ok so, the sum of the masses of the nucleons is greater outside of the nucleus than it is inside the nucleus. But I don't understand how this applies. We are summing the masses of the nucleons while they're inside the isotope. So how can their masses be anything but that?
 
The mass of the atom is just slightly less than the masses of the particles that came together to make the atom. It is impossible to say exactly what the mass of a given proton or neutron is in the atom. As a collective lot, they have lost mass. In coming together, energy is released, and that energy ## E=mc^2 ## accounts for the loss of mass. The mass change is small, but it is not zero. ## \\ ## And the answer to (b) is not worded carefully, in that they should be more precise in saying the masses of the protons and neutrons "as determined prior to being in the isotope".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: opus
Ok I understand that part (to the most minimal extent), as I think that's what the concept of nuclear fusion entails. I just couldn't see how that applied to this problem. I think I get the idea now though, although I have to say that I'm not a big fan of the question.
Thank you, Charles.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K