Iteration method for density equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Method
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the iteration method for density equations in the interaction picture, specifically focusing on the transition from equation (2) to equation (3). While equation (2) is recognized as an exact formula, the need for iteration to derive equation (3) raises questions about its utility, given that it is also exact. The formulas are primarily used for perturbation calculations, where approximations of the density operator ρ are made under the assumption of a constant state without interaction. The conversation highlights that while equation (2) and equation (3) provide corrections to the initial approximation, they do not simplify the process of solving for ρ(t) compared to the original differential equation. Ultimately, these formal solutions serve as a foundation for further development in perturbation theory.
Robert_G
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
hi there; I need some help with the following formulas

In the interaction picture.

##\frac{d}{dt}\rho(t)=\frac{1}{i\hbar}[V(t),\rho(t)]## (1)

Then

##\rho(t+\Delta t) = \rho(t)+\frac{1}{i\hbar}\int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' [V(t'),\rho(t')]## (2)

This equation can be iterated. and it is

##\Delta \rho(t)=\frac{1}{i\hbar}\int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' [V(t'),\rho(t')]+(\frac{1}{i\hbar})^2 \int_t^{t+\Delta t} dt' \int_t^{t'}dt''[\underbrace{V(t'),[V(t'')}_{Note\;t'\;and\;t''},\rho(t'')]]## (3)

##\Delta \rho(t) = \rho(t+\Delta t) - \rho(t)##

I can understand the eq.(2), but not the eq. (3).
Is anybody know how to get the equation (3). and why do we want to do such calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Formula (2) is an exact formula.
By substituting formula (2) into formula (2), you get formula (3).
Formula (3) is therefore also an exact formula.

These formulas are typically used for perturbation calculations.
These are approximations where ρ is constant without the interaction V: ρ(t) ~ρ(0) for V=0.
Replacing ρ(t') = ρ(0) in formula (2) is then a first order approximation.
Replacing ρ(t") = ρ(0) in formula (3) is then a second order approximation.
The second order approximation should be better than the first order ... if this sequence is converging!
 
If formula (2) is already the exact solution. It should contain all the information, why we still iterate it to get the perturbation. It does not make sense to me.
 
It's an exact formula, but not really a solution.
To calculate ρ(t) from equation (2), you need to know ρ(t). (!)
Equation (2) replaces the differential equation (1), by an integral equation (2).
The equation (2) is not easier to solve for ρ(t) than equation (1).

However, equation (2) can be the starting point for an approximate solution.
If ρ(t)=ρ(0) is a good zero order approximation, then equation (2) gives you the first order correction.
Similarly, equation (3) is a second order correction.

Of course, going from these formal equations to a practical solution might not be a piece of cake.
These formal solutions are only a starting point for more developments.

Try these ideas on some exercices.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
826
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
901
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K