MHB K5 Graph: Hamiltonian Circuits & Analysis

Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Consider the complete graph with 5 vertices, denoted by K5.

E.) Does K5 contain Hamiltonian circuits? If yes, draw them.

I know that a Hamiltonian circuit is a graph cycle through a graph that visits each node exactly once. However, the trivial graph on a single node is considered to possesses a Hamiltonian cycle, but the connected graph on two nodes is not. A graph possessing a Hamiltonian circuit is said to be a Hamiltonian graph.

Is it correct that K5 doesn't contain Hamiltonian circuits because this is a connected graph on two nodes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have never done anything related with Graph Theory but with a google search for your problem I found this pdf, where it states that the number of Hamilton circuits in K(n) is
(n-1)! [factorial]

Hope the link will help you with the knowledge you have on graph theory!

http://www.math.ku.edu/~jmartin/courses/math105-F11/Lectures/chapter6-part2.pdf
 
It does not have two nodes, but five nodes. Any complete graph with more than two vertices has a Hamiltonian cycle: just go around the graph in order.
 
Consider the complete graph with 5 vertices, denoted by K5.

Does K5 contain Hamiltonian circuits? If yes, draw them.

Is it correct to say that K5 does contain Hamiltonian circuits because it has more than two vertices?
 
Joystar1977 said:
Is it correct to say that K5 does contain Hamiltonian circuits because it has more than two vertices?

Well, having more than two vertices is not sufficient, by itself, to ensure that any particular graph contains a Hamiltonian circuit. It is necessary. However, because $K_{5}$, in addition to having more than two vertices, contains an edge from any vertex to any other vertex, it is quite straight-forward to construct a Hamiltonian circuit.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top