MHB Kaleigh's question at Yahoo Answers involving eliminating a parameter

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parameter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the equation in the xy-plane for the parametric equations x = cos(t) and y = sec(t). By multiplying these equations, the relationship xy = 1 is derived, which can also be expressed as y = 1/x. This provides a clear equation that represents the graph in the xy-plane. The conversation encourages further exploration of parametric equations and invites additional questions on the topic. The focus remains on the mathematical process of eliminating the parameter t to find the desired equation.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Kaleigh,

We are given the parametric equations:

$$x=\cos(t)$$

$$y=\sec(t)$$

One way we may eliminate the parameter $t$ is to multiply the two equations together, giving:

$$xy=1$$

We may choose to write this as:

$$y=\frac{1}{x}$$

To Kaleigh and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other parametric equations questions in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f21/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top