A Karhunen–Loève theorem expansion random variables

cianfa72
Messages
2,784
Reaction score
293
TL;DR Summary
About the integral involved in the definition of Karhunen–Loève theorem expansion random variable coefficients.
Hi,
in the Karhunen–Loève theorem's statement the random variables in the expansion are given by $$Z_k = \int_a^b X_te_k(t) \: dt$$
##X_t## is a zero-mean square-integrable stochastic process defined over a probability space ##(\Omega, F, P)## and indexed over a closed and bounded interval ##[a, b]##, with continuous covariance function ##K_X(s, t)##.

##e_k(t)## are elements of an orthonormal basis on ##L^2([a, b])## formed by the eigenfunctions of the linear operator ##T_{K_{X}}## with respective eigenvalues ##\lambda_k##. As explained here ##L^2([a, b])## is the Hilbert space of measurable square functions defined on the space ##([a,b], \mathcal B([a,b], P)## that have finite measure. Note that ##\mathcal B([a,b])## is the Borel ##\sigma##-algebra on the closed set ##[a,b]## and ##P## is the Lebesgue measure on it.

I'm confused about the meaning of the integral involved in the definition of random variables ##Z_k##

Which kind of integral is this ?

Ps. I asked the same question on MSE without luck.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems that integrals used in the definition of expansion coefficients are just integrals over the realizations of the stochastic process in the interval ##[a,b]##.

Every coefficient is thus a random variable defined on the same ##(\Omega, F, P)## probability space.

However the above definition requires that each function product of stochastic process's realizations (sample paths) times basis elements ##e_k(t)## has to be integrable over the closed bounded set ##[a,b]## -- see also this lecture.

In particular each of the above function products has to be a measurable function w.r.t. the Borel ##\sigma##-algebra on ##[a,b]##. Thus their integrals are actually Lebesgue integrals, I believe.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top