Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
28 replies · 5K views
Discussion
Physics news on Phys.org
Noisy Rhysling
- 999
- 345
Let me know when it ... ahem ... arrives.
Science Advisor
- 3,625
- 3,311
Also intrigued and somewhat hyped! Can't wait to have my expectations shattered!
- 19,385
- 15,622
Google (you do know how to use Google don't youNoisy Rhysling said:Let me know when it ... ahem ... arrives.
Arrival will arrive in theaters on November 11th.
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,193
- 10,279
Bandersnatch said:Can't wait to have my expectations shattered!

Noisy Rhysling
- 999
- 345
I only use lmgtfy.com, it's user friendly.phinds said:Google (you do know how to use Google don't you) says
At the eleventh hour?Arrival will arrive in theaters on November 11th.
cpscdave
- 402
- 120
Noisy Rhysling said:Let me know when it ... ahem ... arrives.
I don't know what's worse.
That pun... or the fact I chuckled at that pun! lol
Movie looks great! I will be seeing it in the theatre for sure!
- 19,385
- 15,622
Some people just have no sense of humor.phinds said:Google (you do know how to use Google don't you) says
Arrival will arrive in theaters on November 11th.
Oh ... wait ... that's me. Damn.
Noisy Rhysling
- 999
- 345
Straight replies are must a lure to make more puns ... arrive.phinds said:Some people just have no sense of humor.
Oh ... wait ... that's me. Damn.
![]()
Science Advisor
- 3,625
- 3,311
Ooh, yes. Venice festival reviews are painting just the right picture of the film. More hype.
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,193
- 10,279
That is cool, I am looking forward to seeing it!Bandersnatch said:Ooh, yes. Venice festival reviews are painting just the right picture of the film. More hype.
Science Advisor
- 3,625
- 3,311
You know that feeling when you go to watch a film and you're so loaded with hype that you know there's just no way it's not going to disappoint, but then it doesn't? No? Yeah, neither did I. 
Seriously, go watch it. It's great.
Seriously, go watch it. It's great.
Noisy Rhysling
- 999
- 345
Monday afternoon for me. Scouting for Boss Lady. Doesn't look to be getting the screen time here, only screen showing it in any theater.
Brian Shea
- 2
- 0
I think there's some debate among linguists about how the movie addresses communication. It relies on an established theory (the "Sapir-Whorf" theory) that argues that the language we speak shapes how we view the environment we're in. This idea had a lot of advocates for a very long time. More recently, others have argued the opposite: that language reflects culture and environment. I think most linguists agree with the latter these days, though I could be wrong. I haven't seen Arrival, and I'm not too much of a stickler, but I'm curious to see how they address it.
Science Advisor
- 3,625
- 3,311
The ways in which the language in Arrival shapes thought is the main 'fiction' element of this SF.
Having said that, the Saphir-Whorf hypothesis is most certainly not entertained in its original form by linguists, as it was far-fetched in how rigidly it saw the connection, and for which it never garnered any evidence - that's why it's still a hypothesis rather than an 'established theory'. To the film's credit, the only person mentioning it is a physicist in a dream.
For a modern look on the issue look up Lera Boroditsky's research and public talks.
Having said that, the Saphir-Whorf hypothesis is most certainly not entertained in its original form by linguists, as it was far-fetched in how rigidly it saw the connection, and for which it never garnered any evidence - that's why it's still a hypothesis rather than an 'established theory'. To the film's credit, the only person mentioning it is a physicist in a dream.
For a modern look on the issue look up Lera Boroditsky's research and public talks.
Brian Shea
- 2
- 0
Bandersnatch said:The ways in which the language in Arrival shapes thought is the main 'fiction' element of this SF.
Having said that, the Saphir-Whorf hypothesis is most certainly not entertained in its original form by linguists, as it was far-fetched in how rigidly it saw the connection, and for which it never garnered any evidence - that's why it's still a hypothesis rather than an 'established theory'. To the film's credit, the only person mentioning it is a physicist in a dream.
For a modern look on the issue look up Lera Boroditsky's research and public talks.
Great information! I'm halfway through a book about it and it's interesting stuff.
Noisy Rhysling
- 999
- 345
I liked "Contact" despite some real flaws in the plot. "District 9" was a "teach the discriminator about discrimination" movie, so :yawn:gleem said:Saw it the other day. I would rank it behind Contact and District 9 which I found more engaging.
I saw this one again yesterday, I enjoyed it more on the second viewing, I could keep the plot straight. No "what the heck" musings that made me miss things the first time viewing it.
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,193
- 10,279
I've forgotten to post here...
I've seen Arrival and I liked it a lot. Nice atmosphere. I have only seen it once, and I want to see it again.
And here is the Contact trailer if there is anyone reading this thread who has not seen the movie:
I also liked Contact, it's one of my favorite SF movies. The intro scene in that movie is amazing, IMO. By the way, which plot flaws in that movie are you thinking about?Noisy Rhysling said:I liked "Contact" despite some real flaws in the plot.
And here is the Contact trailer if there is anyone reading this thread who has not seen the movie:
mheslep
Gold Member
- 376
- 714
Assuming the FTL, transporting anyone to a place with unkown alien life and then bringing them back to Earth risking back contamination is absurd, at least with no plot device to explain it away. The alien mind-reading only approach to contact in the film makes sense, but the humans planning the mission had no way of knowing that.DennisN said:which plot flaw...
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,193
- 10,279
Good point, thanks!mheslep said:Assuming the FTL, transporting anyone to a place with unkown alien life and then bringing them back to Earth risking back contamination is absurd, at least with no plot device to explain it away. The alien mind-reading only approach to contact in the film makes sense, but the humans planning the mission had no way of knowing that.
Noisy Rhysling
- 999
- 345
I don't think she was all that traumatized, given that she knew her child would die in early adulthood before she conceived. And she was a hero before she was a mother.mheslep said:Scientist mother traumatized by death of child, absent father, but becomes hero with space stuff theme. Maybe Hollywood could give the theme a week or two of downtime before the next repeat.
mheslep
Gold Member
- 376
- 714
The surprise plot twist is irrelevant to the character development as presented to the audience, which in part is ~90 minutes of a mother suffering bits of flashback about a dying child. It's her loss that is used to emotionally connect the audience to the character, just as it was with Gravity.Noisy Rhysling said:I don't think she was all that traumatized, given that she knew her child would die in early adulthood before she conceived. And she was a hero before she was a mother.
Noisy Rhysling
- 999
- 345
The child was going to die earlier than usual, but wasn't dying until she was a young adult.Most of the time we see her as the sort of kid I've avoided being around for five decades.mheslep said:The surprise plot twist is irrelevant to the character development as presented to the audience, which in part is ~90 minutes of a mother suffering bits of flashback about a dying child. It's her loss that is used to emotionally connect the audience to the character, just as it was with Gravity.
Science Advisor
- 3,625
- 3,311
God damnit, Hollywood. Don't you have any new ideas.mheslep said:Scientist mother traumatized by death of child, absent father, but becomes hero with space stuff theme. Maybe Hollywood could give the theme a week or two of downtime before the next repeat.
Mentor
- 23,210
- 7,696
Just saw Arrival. Really, really enjoyed it.
Yeah. I mean, every movie has a plot. When is Hollywood going to start getting off of the bandwagon and making movies without plots??

Bandersnatch said:God damnit, Hollywood. Don't you have any new ideas.
Yeah. I mean, every movie has a plot. When is Hollywood going to start getting off of the bandwagon and making movies without plots??
There's nothing here. I just knew someone would make the joke "They already are".
Last edited:
Noisy Rhysling
- 999
- 345
I liked the fact that the "ships" were just portal, created on the spot. They never really arrived here, we arrived there.
mheslep
Gold Member
- 376
- 714
It's not just the plot ripoffs that annoy, but the repeat of the same SJW sermons: Our single moms who art heavenly, hallowed be thy name. Forgive us our trespass against the environment, as we forgive the deadbeat dads who trespass against us. Sequels forever, amen.Bandersnatch said:God damnit, Hollywood. Don't you have any new ideas...
Similar threads
Requesting suggestions for languages, libraries, and architectures for parallel (and sometimes non parallel) numerical and scientific computations
- manueljenkin
- · Replies 8 ·
- Programming and Computer Science
- Replies
- 8